• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Declare outside IR35 - what the hell, why not!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
    the worst that will happen is that you have to recalculate the tax and pay up what you would have if you were inside IR35 (albeit plus interest). I can live with that.
    Plus the 100% penalty - so actually twice that amount.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by centurian View Post
      Plus the 100% penalty - so actually twice that amount.
      You only get penalised if you have knowingly ignored the rules. Since IR35 is so vague, you can quite rightly say you believed the rules didn't apply to this engagement. Nobody has yet been penalised

      And it's Up To 100%, at the discretion of the Inspector.
      Blog? What blog...?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by malvolio View Post
        Join PCG and the investigation insurance is unconditional. The only requirement is that you're not already under investigation. As a member you'll also have access to more than enough information to work out your actual position and even if you can't there are plenty of members who will be able to...
        Hey Mal, if you have PCG+ membership is there any benefit of also having the QDOS TLC35 insurance?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
          So just declare yourself outside, get specialist advice if you get investigated and the worst that will happen is that you have to recalculate the tax and pay up what you would have if you were inside IR35 (albeit plus interest). I can live with that.
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          Some of us have been saying that for ten years. Seems people are finally starting to listen!
          Good point! The trouble is that HMRC are very slow to take action. They've got 6 years to decide what they are going to do. So they stand around with their hands in their pockets making noises about how dodgy this all is and that we're all going to have to pay tax and penalties for tax evasion to scare people into paying up.

          It's only after 4 or 5 years that the first cases start coming to court and the muddy waters start to clear. It was all a sham from the start but we weren't to know that. There is all sorts of conflicting advice from people who are risk averse or pushing umbrella solutions.

          After all the IR35 fire and brimstone that was preached by HMRC, who's to say that all these offshore loan schemes aren't going to go the same way as IR35 then?

          I think the REAL reason the government is reviewing IR35 is that the cat is out of the bag and people are starting to ignoring it, thus it doesn't make as much money as before so they need to come up with another wheeze.
          Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by ContractIn View Post
            Hey Mal, if you have PCG+ membership is there any benefit of also having the QDOS TLC35 insurance?
            Nope. QDOS will disagree, but basically you'd be insuring against something that isn't going to happen, given the win/loss ratio of cases defended by the PCG cover. You can keep TLC35 if you really want a belt, braces and a spare pair of trousers approach, or you can get Abbey coverage for the same thing through PCG at a discount. Personally I wouldn't bother, but it would be your call.
            Blog? What blog...?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by malvolio View Post
              You only get penalised if you have knowingly ignored the rules. Since IR35 is so vague, you can quite rightly say you believed the rules didn't apply to this engagement. Nobody has yet been penalised

              And it's Up To 100%, at the discretion of the Inspector.
              That was the case with the ex pmg statement and practice in 2000/1. Certainly it seems they may choose to take a harder line.

              HM Revenue & Customs:IR35 - Intermediaries Legislation (IR35) - Working through an intermediary, such as a service company - Consequences of ignoring the legislation

              I think "self declaration" of being outside may be risky, the general bar of "reasonable care" has been raised under the new penalty regime anyway.

              Comment


                #17
                IR35 has always been a con, pure and simple. It was a half baked idea put together by a bunch of lefty, lentil eating half-wits (Dawn Primarolo - that's you) who do not understand anything about companies or business but thought that a group of tax dodging fly-by-night fairies were running off to the hills without paying their share of tax.

                ok, perhaps I went a little over the top there.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by worzelGummidge View Post
                  IR35 has always been a con, pure and simple. It was a half baked idea put together by a bunch of lefty, lentil eating half-wits (Dawn Primarolo - that's you) who do not understand anything about companies or business but thought that a group of tax dodging fly-by-night fairies were running off to the hills without paying their share of tax.

                  ok, perhaps I went a little over the top there.
                  Nope, that's about right...
                  Blog? What blog...?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by worzelGummidge View Post
                    a group of tax dodging fly-by-night fairies were running off to the hills without paying their share of tax.
                    Aiui what happened is that a bunch of bankers got their legal and accounts departments to set up Ltd Co.s on behalf of some high paid employees. The said employees were retained and worked Mondays to Thursdays as employees of the bank and Fridays to Sundays as employees of the Ltd Co.s. This arrangement avoided large sums of tax and NI on overtime payments from the bank.

                    So, yes, a bunch of tax dodging *ankers were running off to the hills without paying their share of tax.

                    Hence IR35 and hence, specifically, the way it is worded and the way it operates.

                    Boo

                    Comment


                      #20
                      +++

                      I think the REAL reason the government is reviewing IR35 is that the cat is out of the bag and people are starting to ignoring it, thus it doesn't make as much money as before so they need to come up with another wheeze.[/QUOTE]



                      --------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Never ever read more truth regarding IR35 review.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X