Originally posted by VictorValiant
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - JR Judgement Day
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
it wouldnt actually surprise me if we get a similar kind of assessment when it goes to the top judges....think they will ask HMRC to justify the need for the retrospection based on an accurate assessment, not someone just throwing around the usual £200m..why parker didnt ask anything like this I dont understand..he just took it as read that they were accurate in their assessment of monies that could be realised, and based on the fact this was an assessment made by a politician he should know better than to just trust what they sayLast edited by smalldog; 16 February 2010, 12:51. -
The Link
For those looking for a link..........
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a5df20c4-1...44feab49a.html
Deals with major companies but the overriding principle ie. retrospection is one we are all familar withComment
-
That's why I used the words "trying something". As we know, they don't always play by the rules, not even their own rules.Originally posted by smalldog View PostDR thats not possible as you know while our CN's are in appeal.Comment
-
Keep those votes coming
The Poll serves 2 purposes
1) it highlights the degree of potential hardship
2) but, just as importantly, it also shows our strength in numbers
Don't be put off voting just because your answer would be No.
Please register and vote.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/register.phpComment
-
HMRC on line....
Any one else unable to get into the their account summay within their Self Assement online account ? "error code SA001 contact HMRC online support"SAY NO TO RETROSPECTIVE TAXComment
-
zippo mine is working fine and it shows an overpayment!!! what dya reckon my chances are....hahahaComment
-
If I make a decision on an answer to your question now can i come back at anytime later and change it ?Originally posted by smalldog View Postzippo mine is working fine and it shows an overpayment!!! what dya reckon my chances are....hahahaSAY NO TO RETROSPECTIVE TAXComment
-
only if its inline with social policyOriginally posted by zippo View PostIf I make a decision on an answer to your question now can i come back at anytime later and change it ?
Comment
-
DR I agree the columns on the gateway in the interest field are blank, however I have a giant adjustment applied to one specific tax year which is an interest charge for all tax years so its not completely clear on the portal...just trying to let people know they should check their individual situationOriginally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostCheck the statement of account with your CNs. Mine did include interest.
If you are registered with the Government Gateway, then the figures shown on-line do not include interest.
If you were in the scheme a long time then there will be a huge difference between the total with and without interest.
In my case, tax/nic was in the order of £100k; with interest £150k.
Quick and Dirty Estimate
This works in my case but may not for others.
To get an estimate of tax/nic, add up the total trust income for the years in the scheme. Then multiply by 0.4 (40%).
It should be obvious whether the figure you are looking at includes interest or not. If it is over 50% of the total trust income, then it must include interest, since the maximum tax rate is 40%.Last edited by smalldog; 16 February 2010, 15:19.Comment
-
Why does that not surprise me. I think you are right in saying that everyone needs to check their own situation in terms of tax/nic liability and interest accrued so far.Originally posted by smalldog View Postso its not completely clear on the portalComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment