Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Service Company Question in Personal Self assessment
Collapse
X
-
I like big butts and I cannot lie. -
I've just received my tax return from my accountant and he has included a note:
"I have not addressed the service company question on Page TR4 as I do not believe this information is reasonably required as part of a personal return or necessary for the calculation of my income tax liability for 2011/12 under self-assessment."
I know that it isn't the P35 question but is this going to get me into trouble with HMRC if I send it off?Comment
-
Originally posted by Redcar View PostI've just received my tax return from my accountant and he has included a note:
"I have not addressed the service company question on Page TR4 as I do not believe this information is reasonably required as part of a personal return or necessary for the calculation of my income tax liability for 2011/12 under self-assessment."
I know that it isn't the P35 question but is this going to get me into trouble with HMRC if I send it off?
Most penalties are tax or delay geared, and there is little if any chance of HMRC being able to penalise this. More over I think the question is so imprecise, and the nature of answers, if given at all, so variable, that HMRC are not extracting any useful compliance information from it.
My partner is a contractor, and I left it blank on her form.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jessica@WhiteFieldTax View PostAlmost certainly not.
Most penalties are tax or delay geared, and there is little if any chance of HMRC being able to penalise this. More over I think the question is so imprecise, and the nature of answers, if given at all, so variable, that HMRC are not extracting any useful compliance information from it.
My partner is a contractor, and I left it blank on her form.I like big butts and I cannot lie.Comment
-
I wouldn't loose sleep over the discrepancy, although answering either in affirmative could put an alert on you with HMRC.
However this is a personal view - but one I would defend professionally - and there's little definitive hard and fast evidence out there on this.Comment
-
I recently did an interview, dealing with the service company question on the self assessment tax return:
Contractor guide to answering the self-assessment tax return service company questionComment
-
Fill it in and don't worry about it.
HMRC inspectors are not useless. They are good at what they do so they will find you even if you try to hide. If your agonising that much over a single box I'd hate to see what an IR35 investigation would do for your state of mind.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostCompleting this box has become part of the PAYE regs for 2013/14 tax year so you will be required by law to enter yes or no in next year's SA form
Off the top of my head, I can't see PAYE regs effecting SAR - they would have to do something with TMA for that.
But, I emphasise, I may well be wrong...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment