BN66 - the road to Judicial Review

[bombaycat]

Post appeal change in liability - worth querying/

Wondered if this had happened to anyone else...

Before CN's my statement said I was owed £1480 by HMRC (which obviously they wouldn't pay me due to investigation) after CNs and post appeal adjustments for 2 years my statement now says that I owe £330 - plus the second pymt on acc due July. Now these numbers aren't large compared to the CN numbers but it seems to me that they have done somewhat of a double shuffle and thereby trying to sneak about £1800 from me for no reason that I know of.

Would you refer this back to MontP or would you just settle up and wait for the party post JR success?

[BrilloPad]

Going back to the petition( http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/RepealSection58/ ), I note that Geoff Jones of arctic systems signed. He is a PCG director. Via the PCG forums he sent a message of support for our fight against retrosopection.

BP

[DonkeyRhubarb]

A bit of publicity for the cause:

<snip>

[KiwiGuy]

A bit of publicity for the cause:

<snip>

just giving me an error page

[smalldog]

just giving me an error page

go to the website itself, there is a link to the article on the banner at the top.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

go to the website itself, there is a link to the article on the banner at the top.

They must have changed the link. Try this:

<snip>

[elpinar]

weell done DR - just got back from hols and been catching up on the thread

THINK WE SHOULD ALL READ THIS



This test only has one question, but it's a very important one.


By
giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand
morally.

The
test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which
you will have to make a decision.

Remember
that your answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous.

Please
scroll down slowly and give due consideration to each
line.

THE
SITUATION

You
are in England
, York
to be specific. There is chaos all around you caused by a
hurricane with severe flooding.. This is a flood of biblical
proportions.

You
are a photo-journalist working for a major newspaper, and you're
caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is
nearly hopeless.

You're
trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people
swirling around you, some disappearing into the water. Nature is
unleashing all its destructive fury.

THE
TEST

Suddenly,
you see a man in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying
not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer... Somehow,
the man looks familiar...

You
suddenly realize who it is... It's Gordon Brown! You notice that
the raging waters are about to take him under forever. You have
two options:

1st
You can save the life of Gordon Brown

or
2nd
you can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize-winning
photo, documenting the death of one of the country's most
powerful men!






THE
QUESTION

Here's
the question, and please give an honest answer. . . . . . .. . .





Would
you select high contrast colour film,
or
Would
you go with the classic simplicity of black and
white?

[Fred Bloggs]

I'm afraid the camera on my phone would have to do under the circumstances. I couldn't possibly risk missing the opportunity of photographing the UK's most hated man now, could I?

[TykeMerc]

Would
you select high contrast colour film,
or
Would
you go with the classic simplicity of black and
white?

Black and white definitely assuming I had it loaded so wouldn't miss the shot.

[TaxDude]

This is better than we could have ever hoped for. There is no other word for it than damning.

JCHR Twentieth Report
Apart from section 58, it also covers Clause 67 of this year's finance bill, which they have judged not to be in breach of the human rights act.
http://www.publications.parliament.u.../133/13302.htm

Section 58 Finance Act 2008
The Committee's review of the legislation.
http://www.publications.parliament.u...3/13304.htm#a5

Letter from JCHR to Stephen Timms
Sent Tuesday 7th July.
http://www.publications.parliament.u...3/13308.htm#a6

DR - I can only say thank you, thank you, thank you