Originally posted by bombaycat
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by Toocan View PostThat only applied to PAYE avoidance scheme's - it does not apply to the scheme that is being discussed here. We know that because HMRC are not attempting to classify us as employee's of any kind.
If HMRC did try that, they would not be able to collect any tax.I'm not sure. Firstly the regime was specifically extended to cover schemes which reduced NI, also surely HMRC view is that the partnership income is subject to schedule D at UK rates not IOM rates. Are they looking for NI as well or just TAX?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostI'm not sure. Firstly the regime was specifically extended to cover schemes which reduced NI, also surely HMRC view is that the partnership income is subject to schedule D at UK rates not IOM rates. Are they looking for NI as well or just TAX?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostI'm not sure. Firstly the regime was specifically extended to cover schemes which reduced NI, also surely HMRC view is that the partnership income is subject to schedule D at UK rates not IOM rates. Are they looking for NI as well or just TAX?
If Dawn's statement could have been used against the DTA scheme then HMRC would have tried it - they haven't.There's an elephant wondering around here...Comment
-
The trust income WILL be subject to NI on the same basis as the self employment income. This means that for most people the trust income will be taxed at 41% for those in the higher rate, not 40%.Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View Postreading the above I think I would give up entirely.
If you are going to be negative be constructive.- SL -Comment
-
Originally posted by silver_lining View Postwhen I see posts like this, it just winds me up..... 'vampirious negateeti'... i.e. drainers that just feed on negativity.
If you are going to be negative be constructive.
It's amazing how many permies used to trot that line out to me when I was contracting.
The govt. are trying to blur the difference between the words "tax avoidance" and "tax evasion". They have a 1 trillion or so hole in their finances thanks to Gordon's spending spree and need to plug the gap with money from decent hard-working people.
Fortunately, the courts know the difference between "avoidance" and "evasion", the first of which every person has a right to use.'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by Toocan View PostDawn Steal-a-rolo's statement was specifically aimed at PAYE taxes - self employed NI is not collected via PAYE.
If Dawn's statement could have been used against the DTA scheme then HMRC would have tried it - they haven't.
HMRC have stated that bhey made it clear to the tax profession and taxpayer that the DTA sceme died not work.
I assumed this refered to Dawn Primarola's statement in 2004. If you do not think it did when and how did HMRC make it clear the DTA woulod not work.Comment
-
Originally posted by silver_lining View Postwhen I see posts like this, it just winds me up..... 'vampirious negateeti'... i.e. drainers that just feed on negativity.
If you are going to be negative be constructive.Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostI bet Blaster Bates still believes that old line that our taxes are used to hire more nurses
It's amazing how many permies used to trot that line out to me when I was contracting.
The govt. are trying to blur the difference between the words "tax avoidance" and "tax evasion". They have a 1 trillion or so hole in their finances thanks to Gordon's spending spree and need to plug the gap with money from decent hard-working people.
Fortunately, the courts know the difference between "avoidance" and "evasion", the first of which every person has a right to use.Comment
-
Next JR?
Are we not due for another JR (appeal) about now? Anyone know anything?Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
http://notoretrotax.org.ukComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Yesterday 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment