• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by bombaycat View Post
    George Orwell must be turning in his grave!! We are completely there now doublethink has become a daily reality.
    I think it was George Osbourne who said in the commons something like "1984 was a novel, not an instruction manual"

    Comment


      Originally posted by Toocan View Post
      That only applied to PAYE avoidance scheme's - it does not apply to the scheme that is being discussed here. We know that because HMRC are not attempting to classify us as employee's of any kind.

      If HMRC did try that, they would not be able to collect any tax.
      I'm not sure. Firstly the regime was specifically extended to cover schemes which reduced NI, also surely HMRC view is that the partnership income is subject to schedule D at UK rates not IOM rates. Are they looking for NI as well or just TAX?

      Comment


        Originally posted by ASB View Post
        I'm not sure. Firstly the regime was specifically extended to cover schemes which reduced NI, also surely HMRC view is that the partnership income is subject to schedule D at UK rates not IOM rates. Are they looking for NI as well or just TAX?
        Just tax + interest. No NI, no penalties.

        Comment


          Originally posted by ASB View Post
          I'm not sure. Firstly the regime was specifically extended to cover schemes which reduced NI, also surely HMRC view is that the partnership income is subject to schedule D at UK rates not IOM rates. Are they looking for NI as well or just TAX?
          Dawn Steal-a-rolo's statement was specifically aimed at PAYE taxes - self employed NI is not collected via PAYE.

          If Dawn's statement could have been used against the DTA scheme then HMRC would have tried it - they haven't.
          There's an elephant wondering around here...

          Comment


            The trust income WILL be subject to NI on the same basis as the self employment income. This means that for most people the trust income will be taxed at 41% for those in the higher rate, not 40%.

            Comment


              Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
              reading the above I think I would give up entirely.
              when I see posts like this, it just winds me up..... 'vampirious negateeti'... i.e. drainers that just feed on negativity.

              If you are going to be negative be constructive.
              - SL -

              Comment


                Originally posted by silver_lining View Post
                when I see posts like this, it just winds me up..... 'vampirious negateeti'... i.e. drainers that just feed on negativity.

                If you are going to be negative be constructive.
                I bet Blaster Bates still believes that old line that our taxes are used to hire more nurses

                It's amazing how many permies used to trot that line out to me when I was contracting.

                The govt. are trying to blur the difference between the words "tax avoidance" and "tax evasion". They have a 1 trillion or so hole in their finances thanks to Gordon's spending spree and need to plug the gap with money from decent hard-working people.

                Fortunately, the courts know the difference between "avoidance" and "evasion", the first of which every person has a right to use.
                'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
                Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Toocan View Post
                  Dawn Steal-a-rolo's statement was specifically aimed at PAYE taxes - self employed NI is not collected via PAYE.

                  If Dawn's statement could have been used against the DTA scheme then HMRC would have tried it - they haven't.

                  HMRC have stated that bhey made it clear to the tax profession and taxpayer that the DTA sceme died not work.

                  I assumed this refered to Dawn Primarola's statement in 2004. If you do not think it did when and how did HMRC make it clear the DTA woulod not work.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by silver_lining View Post
                    when I see posts like this, it just winds me up..... 'vampirious negateeti'... i.e. drainers that just feed on negativity.

                    If you are going to be negative be constructive.
                    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
                    I bet Blaster Bates still believes that old line that our taxes are used to hire more nurses

                    It's amazing how many permies used to trot that line out to me when I was contracting.

                    The govt. are trying to blur the difference between the words "tax avoidance" and "tax evasion". They have a 1 trillion or so hole in their finances thanks to Gordon's spending spree and need to plug the gap with money from decent hard-working people.

                    Fortunately, the courts know the difference between "avoidance" and "evasion", the first of which every person has a right to use.
                    Alas CUK is full of trolls and wind-up merchants......

                    Comment


                      Next JR?

                      Are we not due for another JR (appeal) about now? Anyone know anything?
                      Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                      http://notoretrotax.org.uk

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X