• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Does a gap of 3 months between contracts reset the 24 month rule?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by TheBigYinJames View Post
    Is rawly available to work out my tax liability?
    What, you want me to Tax you twice.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by rawly View Post
      What, you want me to Tax you twice.
      No i want you to turn 28% into 88%
      Cooking doesn't get tougher than this.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by TheBigYinJames View Post
        I think the most heinous part of the recent changes is that if they can deem you to have made no substantive change to your journey then they can treat it as a single site.

        So if you live in London and travel to a gig in Leeds, and then later, travel to a gig in Bradford or Wakefield, they could argue that the journey is pretty much identical, even if the places are quite far apart.
        Which recent changes are you referring to?

        I remember it being this way in 1998.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Integrity View Post
          Which recent changes are you referring to?
          I remember it being this way in 1998.
          I remember flares the first time round. 88 is recent for me
          Seriously, I thought this was a recent thing, i thought they were 'cracking down' on expense claims
          Cooking doesn't get tougher than this.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
            The 24 month rule comes into place as soon as you know you will be there for more than 24 months, 3 months isn’t enough of a gap (not sure but its at least a year) so 12+3+10 = 25 months so you should have stopped claiming travel expenses when you took the 10 month contract.
            Thank you for all the replies.

            I didn't consider the possibility that 'time' at a temporary work location could be interpreted as 'time elapsed' (12+3+10=25 months) rather than 'time worked' (12+10=22 months) .

            Suppose you did a 6 month contract once a year (January to June) at a particular site. Does that really mean that travel expenses are not claimable in year 3?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Moptop View Post
              Thank you for all the replies.

              I didn't consider the possibility that 'time' at a temporary work location could be interpreted as 'time elapsed' (12+3+10=25 months) rather than 'time worked' (12+10=22 months) .

              Suppose you did a 6 month contract once a year (January to June) at a particular site. Does that really mean that travel expenses are not claimable in year 3?

              My opinion would be not claimable, as you would still be there over 40% of the time.

              Comment

              Working...
              X