• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back!!!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    However I will tell you one thing - as I have posted several times before - f4j is run by one man. He is called Matt O'Connor. As you can imagine he is tough and uncomprimising - what you would expect from someone who runs an organization with a bigger file on them than Al Quaeda. And Matt once called me the most evil c**t he had ever met. In fact, when he gave me the signed copy of his book (where I feature several times) he put that inscription in the front.
    Got'cha. So any tax inspectors investigating you, would be will advised to play nice or have some nasty things done to them. As long as you are clear about your threat(and I think you have been reasonably clear), everyone should know the consequences of stepping over the line with any bad(or even illegal) practices. Nothing to do with the courts, I'm assuming.

    Comment


      Originally posted by max View Post
      Got'cha. So any tax inspectors investigating you, would be will advised to play nice or have some nasty things done to them. As long as you are clear about your threat(and I think you have been reasonably clear), everyone should know the consequences of stepping over the line with any bad(or even illegal) practices. Nothing to do with the courts, I'm assuming.
      Hello Mr Brannigan
      Last edited by BrilloPad; 5 August 2008, 19:28. Reason: Can't be bothered with trolls anymore

      Comment


        Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
        Oh yeah. I walked into that one. you are sooo clever

        You have no idea what I did or did not do. Some bits involved solicitors and courts - some did not. Alas the most exciting bits got removed from Matt's book...

        Are you related to Mal? Or Maybe Mr Brannigan's (hello ) boyfriend?
        Sorry for annoying you. Just wondering if you were man enough to clearly describe what you intended by the continuous underlying threats of violence you make towards the tax guys.

        Is that wrong?

        Comment


          Originally posted by max View Post
          Sorry for annoying you. Just wondering if you were man enough to clearly describe what you intended by the continuous underlying threats of violence you make towards the tax guys.

          Is that wrong?
          Gosh you replied quickly. Rather spoilt my edit! I salute you Sir!

          I have not said if violence or not. Afraid I am not man enough to be explicit. It is one of my many problems. Really I should like a good clean fight - instead I like kicking people when they are down, knifing in the back and all those cadish things. Rather puts me on a par with Mr Brannigan (hello ).

          Comment


            Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
            HMRC charge simple interest, not compound interest. For example, suppose your liability as of today was £100k tax + £40k interest. In a year's time (assuming 7.5% interest) your liability would be:
            £100k + £7.5k (+ £40k)

            In 2 years, it would be:
            £100k + £7.5k + £7.5k (+ £40k)

            If you stick £100k in a CTD today, then your liability would be fixed forever at £140k. There is no point in putting the extra £40k in a CTD because it pays a piss poor rate of interest.
            Thanks for the clarification!
            I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

            Comment


              Brillo et al,

              I wish you would refrain from answering people like Max, Mal etc. It simply ties up an otherwise useful thread with tulipe. You are just throwing only more breadcrumbs at the starving headless chickens.

              These people are merely fed from our responses to them; cut out the responses and they simply die.

              Not to mention you don't know who the idiots are in contact with, private thread time.... as suggested by one of the earlier posts.

              SL
              - SL -

              Comment


                Originally posted by silver_lining View Post
                Brillo et al,

                I wish you would refrain from answering people like Max, Mal etc. It simply ties up an otherwise useful thread with tulipe. You are just throwing only more breadcrumbs at the starving headless chickens.

                These people are merely fed from our responses to them; cut out the responses and they simply die.

                Not to mention you don't know who the idiots are in contact with, private thread time.... as suggested by one of the earlier posts.

                SL
                Dear God, another one...
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                  Dear God, another one...
                  87

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                    However I will tell you one thing - as I have posted several times before - f4j is run by one man. He is called Matt O'Connor. As you can imagine he is tough and uncomprimising - what you would expect from someone who runs an organization with a bigger file on them than Al Quaeda. And Matt once called me the most evil c**t he had ever met. In fact, when he gave me the signed copy of his book (where I feature several times) he put that inscription in the front.
                    Brillo (or should we now call you Big Vin),

                    You had me fooled. For a while I thought you were almost worth listening to. Nice of you to now tell us that you are so mad, bad and dangerous to know, and also a “most evil c**t” to boot. Wow! I’m sure your threats are echoing around the corridors of power right now:
                    “No, we are going to have to drop the BN66 case – some bloke has posted some threats on a bulletin board and he sounds a right nutter!”.

                    Meanwhile, over at MI5, the call rings out:”
                    “Sorry guys, you two still working on the al Qaeda stuff. Drop everything and join up with the rest, there’s a rumour been picked up that some bloke with a cape has been seen approaching another crane…!”.

                    Delusions of grandeur, anyone?

                    Oh dear….

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Gooner99 View Post
                      Brillo (or should we now call you Big Vin),

                      You had me fooled. For a while I thought you were almost worth listening to. Nice of you to now tell us that you are so mad, bad and dangerous to know, and also a “most evil c**t” to boot. Wow! I’m sure your threats are echoing around the corridors of power right now:
                      “No, we are going to have to drop the BN66 case – some bloke has posted some threats on a bulletin board and he sounds a right nutter!”.

                      Meanwhile, over at MI5, the call rings out:”
                      “Sorry guys, you two still working on the al Qaeda stuff. Drop everything and join up with the rest, there’s a rumour been picked up that some bloke with a cape has been seen approaching another crane…!”.

                      Delusions of grandeur, anyone?

                      Oh dear….
                      I know you have never been worth listening to.

                      Now get back to work! you have our closure notices to issue...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X