BN66 - Time to fight back!!!

[BrilloPad]

I am reading this thread with great interest.

[MrBrannigan]

I just dont think we should be discussing illegal action on a public forum,

The most illegal bit was what you lot did in the first place. You are not even borderline avoidance - it is total evasion. We have great powers to deal with major league criminals - that is what we are dealing with here.

I suggest you just give yourselves up now and come quietly.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

I am reading this thread with great interest.

Pack it in now, otherwise I will report you.

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005..._20050011_en_1

23. The Act consolidates former criminal offence provisions relating to the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise, to create a single framework for these offences within HMRC. In addition to consolidating those offence provisions, the Act brings their penalties into line with the equivalent Police offences. The offences are assaulting, obstructing or impersonating an officer of Revenue and Customs. Section 33 provides HMRC officers, where authorised by Commissioners, with the power of arrest for these offences.

[smalldog]

Mr Brannigan, will you stop your idiots wasting tax payers money!!!! Yet another lost legal case...jeeez when are they going to learn....wonder how much that little legal case cost that could have been utilised on something of meaning and value to the general public...makes me so mad!!!

Pringles, the popular snack food in a tube, are not potato crisps, a High Court judge has ruled.

Their packaging, "unnatural shape" and the fact that the potato content is less than 50% helped Mr Justice Warren make his crunch decision.

As a result, Pringles, in all flavours are free from Value Added Tax (VAT).

Manufacturer Procter & Gamble (P&G) is likely to save millions of pounds as a result of the decision - with customers also likely to pay less.

P&G had gone to court to challenge a VAT and Duties Tribunal decision that the Pringle was subject to the standard 17.5% rate of VAT because it was "a potato crisp product", which are, unlike most food, subject to the tax.

[Diver]

gosh your right, no caps, how about that, you're so clever and I'm so stupid, I guess that's that's your objective here, well done old boy..

anyone heard of off-topic pomposity?

Is that anything like Anally Retentive ?

You actually think that Hector has time to read all the posts floating around in the Bullsh!t Matrix ?

PS. Thanks for using Capitals

[smalldog]

just phoned up to pay some money on account for 07/08 and was told my account is locked and they couldnt do anything with it....think they are busy getting our SA's ready for royal assent!

[MrBrannigan]

Pack it in now, otherwise I will report you.

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005..._20050011_en_1

23. The Act consolidates former criminal offence provisions relating to the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise, to create a single framework for these offences within HMRC. In addition to consolidating those offence provisions, the Act brings their penalties into line with the equivalent Police offences. The offences are assaulting, obstructing or impersonating an officer of Revenue and Customs. Section 33 provides HMRC officers, where authorised by Commissioners, with the power of arrest for these offences.

Any chance of you impersonating a law abiding citizen?

[poppy01]

Is that anything like Anally Retentive ?

You actually think that Hector has time to read all the posts floating around in the Bullsh!t Matrix ?

PS. Thanks for using Capitals

i know damn sure he reads this thread on this forum,
and screw you and your capitals

[ContractIn]

just phoned up to pay some money on account for 07/08 and was told my account is locked and they couldnt do anything with it....think they are busy getting our SA's ready for royal assent!

I received reminder today from HMRC to pay remainder on account for 07/08. I'll do it by DD anyway and wait to see if I get any notice back.

I've been offline for a while, where are we at? anynews on royal assent, montpelier comms, thats a no, JR timescales etc?

Cheers

[SantaClaus]

Mr Brannigan, will you stop your idiots wasting tax payers money!!!! Yet another lost legal case...jeeez when are they going to learn....wonder how much that little legal case cost that could have been utilised on something of meaning and value to the general public...makes me so mad!!!

Pringles, the popular snack food in a tube, are not potato crisps, a High Court judge has ruled.

Their packaging, "unnatural shape" and the fact that the potato content is less than 50% helped Mr Justice Warren make his crunch decision.

As a result, Pringles, in all flavours are free from Value Added Tax (VAT).

Manufacturer Procter & Gamble (P&G) is likely to save millions of pounds as a result of the decision - with customers also likely to pay less.

P&G had gone to court to challenge a VAT and Duties Tribunal decision that the Pringle was subject to the standard 17.5% rate of VAT because it was "a potato crisp product", which are, unlike most food, subject to the tax.

Thats just too bad, I had you all down for Pringles as Christmas presents.