Im not doing anything with advice etc until I'll leave Montp do their thing. each to their own but until Montp lose I dont see much point in spending more cash, I potentially owe SH*T loads already so piling more on top isnt appealing...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back!!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Liability estimate
I have just had my liability estimated by MontP, for all years excluding 07/08, should HMRC be successful.
Estimate , including interest payments, is approx £150K.
07/08 will also need to be added to this, but as I quit scheme in July 07, it won't add that much. I reckon I am looking at £165K total.
I feel a visit to the Pawn Brokers is in order, followed by the local Hostelry !
MadComment
-
Originally posted by Maddog View PostI have just had my liability estimated by MontP, for all years excluding 07/08, should HMRC be successful.
Estimate , including interest payments, is approx £150K.
07/08 will also need to be added to this, but as I quit scheme in July 07, it won't add that much. I reckon I am looking at £165K total.
I feel a visit to the Pawn Brokers is in order, followed by the local Hostelry !
Mad
ThanksComment
-
Maddog,
I can't see it does any harm to get some independent advice, and in my book you deserve a lot of credit for taking the initiative and stumping up the cash. For me, there is only one question I would want to ask:
Are we kidding ourselves thinking that we stand any chance of overturning government legislation (Clause 55)?
From past experience, one thing I would be wary of is if the advisor tries to turn the meeting into a fishing expedition for further business. You may want to emphasise that this is strictly a one-off consultation.
If you don't mind me asking, when is the meeting taking place and were you intending to report the outcome here?
Good luck.
DRLast edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 18 June 2008, 09:20.Comment
-
Originally posted by Maddog View PostI have just had my liability estimated by MontP, for all years excluding 07/08, should HMRC be successful.
Estimate , including interest payments, is approx £150K...etc
Mad
Are you still better off than if you had fallen into the IR35 trap?Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostMaddog,
I can't see it does any harm to get some independent advice, and in my book you deserve a lot of credit for taking the initiative and stumping up the cash. For me, there is only one question I would want to ask:
Are we kidding ourselves thinking that we stand any chance of overturning government legislation (Clause 55)?
From past experience, one thing I would be wary of is if the advisor tries to turn the meeting into a fishing expedition for further business. You may want to emphasise that this is strictly a one-off consultation.
If you don't mind me asking, when is the meeting taking place and were you intending to report the outcome here?
Good luck.
DR
surely what hmrc have done here is unprecedentedComment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostMaddog,
I can't see it does any harm to get some independent advice, and in my book you deserve a lot of credit for taking the initiative and stumping up the cash. For me, there is only one question I would want to ask:
Are we kidding ourselves thinking that we stand any chance of overturning government legislation (Clause 55)?
The answer to this question is one of the key outcomes I am looking to acheive from the meeting. I know he cannot provide a certain yes/no, but his degree of certaintiy of the likely outcome will assist me in my next cause of action
From past experience, one thing I would be wary of is if the advisor tries to turn the meeting into a fishing expedition for further business. You may want to emphasise that this is strictly a one-off consultation.
Any additional consultancy will need to be justified, not only to me, but my 6 co-schemers. If he can justify extra expenditure on our behalf (i.e. save us money in the long term), we will consider it. As I have previoulsy stated, i will be providing a series of questions that I want answering, hence ensuring time is put to good use.
If you don't mind me asking, when is the meeting taking place and were you intending to report the outcome here?
Date has not been set. I have to provide some documentation that he would like to review prior to the meeting i.e. all those loverly letters from the revenue.
If info I recieve is of benefit to people in a similar situation to myself, I will of course share this.
Good luck.
DRComment
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View PostI know a few people have said we dont stand much chance, courts are reluctant to overturn tax law etc.. etc.. but..
surely what hmrc have done here is unprecedented
I think it would be interesting to get the opinion of an independent tax expert but at the end of the day that is just one opinion so we may be non the wiser.Comment
-
This may have NO place on this thread however there are what seems some good posters here who may appreciate the heads up when looking at schemes and hearing feed back on their current IOM providers.
There is a scheme promoted by a company called Denovo solar who from what I am aware were in fact a recruitment company however they seem to have changed complete direction and become a tax planning outfit....... what's that all about does anyone have an idea?
Anyway they are promoting a scheme called "E cover solutions" that claims it does not need to be disclosed to gooner and his mates at HMRC therefore it requires no QC opinion..... In the little exp I have with tax planning combined with some friends of mine, who in my opinion are serial tax planners when it comes to mitigating income, CGT and anything else they can reckon that any structure you are looking to enter MUST have a QC opinion and the provider MUST have a good track record when it comes to court battles with gooner and his friends. They should always be prepared to fight up to and inc european HR courts at their cost. E cover solutions do NOT do this....I have also found out that...possibly Mr Jones is behind this e cover solutions offering! anyone know anymore on this?
One of my friends jointly runs a hedge fund and his big glass desk has a pile of different schemes along with many investigations from HMRC that he has entered into....... although regardless of the amount he has done and has had results and investigations that are still pending, he still entered one in Feb of this year. His schemes date back 10 years and the most used provider is Montpelier. He is very confident in their ability to fight with HMRC as he believes they are in the business for the long term not just to get rich quick from a few schemes. His point of "although they are in the business to fight HMRC if their IP is challenged, they are not in the business of being in court most days as they need to get on" therefore he regards their IP to be very strong and less aggressive than most.
That said he earns 20 times what I earn and just looks at it as a long term investment that could go wrong or could possibly yield some fine results, as many of them have.
Either way thought that the above warning on a possible new Jones scheme was worth the post.Comment
-
Originally posted by Maddog View PostI have just had my liability estimated by MontP, for all years excluding 07/08, should HMRC be successful.
Estimate , including interest payments, is approx £150K.
07/08 will also need to be added to this, but as I quit scheme in July 07, it won't add that much. I reckon I am looking at £165K total.
I feel a visit to the Pawn Brokers is in order, followed by the local Hostelry !
Mad
Cheers
BPComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment