• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Umberalla users should they be worried ?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I agree HMRC and Government and MPs are a total bunch of hypocrites, I hate them so ******* much.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Bumfluff View Post
      I agree HMRC and Government and MPs are a total bunch of hypocrites, I hate them so ******* much.
      If you can't beat them join them.
      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Bumfluff View Post
        I agree HMRC and Government and MPs are a total bunch of hypocrites, I hate them so ******* much.
        I agree 100% - this was reported on 5 live last week and they said it was up to £250 and that MP's could expense anything they wanted because the poor lambs have to run 2 houses if their constituency is away from London. Hence they have put through plasma TV's, IPods and pretty much anything they wanted. Or to put it another way, you and I have bought them these things.

        So if I decide to buy a place near London for my employees to use, could I expense these type of items. Not bleedin likely - The IR would jump up and down all over this. Why do MP's get away with this? I guess the fact that they make the rules has something to do with it! The fecin cheating gits
        Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

        I preferred version 1!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
          I agree 100% - this was reported on 5 live last week and they said it was up to £250 and that MP's could expense anything they wanted because the poor lambs have to run 2 houses if their constituency is away from London. Hence they have put through plasma TV's, IPods and pretty much anything they wanted. Or to put it another way, you and I have bought them these things.

          So if I decide to buy a place near London for my employees to use, could I expense these type of items. Not bleedin likely - The IR would jump up and down all over this. Why do MP's get away with this? I guess the fact that they make the rules has something to do with it! The fecin cheating gits
          As it happens there are some different rules. Whether that is right or wrong is a different matter although I am firmly in the latter camp.

          However, they do have to fill out one of these (somewhat out of data admittedly).

          http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pdfs/1998_99/...101(mp)nts.pdf

          Comment


            #15
            It's not just MPs and HMRC, either - look at this git

            Comment


              #16
              umbrella users

              is there any reason why responsible (only expenses are what I spent) contractors need be worried???

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by tommyboy View Post
                is there any reason why responsible (only expenses are what I spent) contractors need be worried???
                Nope.

                They are going after umbrellas like these: http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ighlight=Giant
                "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                Comment


                  #18
                  So are people saying that umbrella companies are now legal as long as you don't claim any expenses that you are not entitled to?

                  I thought that umbrellas were illegal anyway because they are tax evasion vehicles?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by multiuk View Post
                    So are people saying that umbrella companies are now legal as long as you don't claim any expenses that you are not entitled to?

                    I thought that umbrellas were illegal anyway because they are tax evasion vehicles?
                    Eh? What on earth are you on about?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by multiuk View Post
                      So are people saying that umbrella companies are now legal as long as you don't claim any expenses that you are not entitled to?

                      I thought that umbrellas were illegal anyway because they are tax evasion vehicles?
                      Nurse!!!
                      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X