I'm wondering if anyone with shares held by a spouse ought to be looking at a share buyback by yourco?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Income Shifting
Collapse
X
-
-
The mechanics of HOW you do it aren't relevant at this point (nor are they particularly difficult to implement).Originally posted by boxman View PostI'm wondering if anyone with shares held by a spouse ought to be looking at a share buyback by yourco?
What matters is that if you currently have a spouse without any taxable income apart from your dividends, then she will not be able to get those dividends next year.
For 2008-09, I believe the higher rate starts at £36,000 of taxable income (i.e. £36k + personal allowance).
If you pay that out as a dividend to yourself, it will cost £36,000 * 25% = £9,000
Previously it would have cost nothing
So the bottom line is you will be £9,000 poorer next year, assuming you pay the same amount of dividends (which assumes that your company makes at least £72,000 in profit).
On top of that, there's the Corporation Tax rises to worry about, another 1% in April, going up to 21% then, which on that £72,000 is £1,500.
So it's well over £10k in tax rises.....Comment
-
So one could employ your wife do perform admin & accounting duties for the business, which mine does, and pay a salary, but from 2008/2009 she will no longer be able to be a shareholder.
I love this governmentComment
-
Bit confused by the Pre-budget document
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/h...pbr_report.pdf
It says 2008-09 Tacking Income Shifting +£25m, 2009-10 £260m
But then it says it will be introduced for 2008-09, so why would they only make £25m out of it in 2008-09, but £260m in 2009-10?Comment
-
What happens where the spouse provided the startup capital of the company? Surely there is entitlement to dividends there.Originally posted by dude69 View PostWhat matters is that if you currently have a spouse without any taxable income apart from your dividends, then she will not be able to get those dividends next year.
I'm not thinking of a typical IT contractor company here, but one which involves substantial dosh to set up in the first place.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
It is going to be quite complex I think. I'm sure there will be IR35-style avoidance/scope issues.Originally posted by Sysman View PostWhat happens where the spouse provided the startup capital of the company? Surely there is entitlement to dividends there.
I'm not thinking of a typical IT contractor company here, but one which involves substantial dosh to set up in the first place.
But your basic contractor company with only the one person working is clearly in scope.Comment
-
Why 25%
Why have you used 25% for the £36k - surely if you are making £72k then the £36k lower rate is already used so it should be 40% if you take on the extra £36k from your spouseOriginally posted by dude69 View PostFor 2008-09, I believe the higher rate starts at £36,000 of taxable income (i.e. £36k + personal allowance).
If you pay that out as a dividend to yourself, it will cost £36,000 * 25% = £9,000
Previously it would have cost nothing
So the bottom line is you will be £9,000 poorer next year, assuming you pay the same amount of dividends (which assumes that your company makes at least £72,000 in profit).Comment
-
So if my spouse cannot earn divi's on the shares it is only right the company buys the shares back isn't it ? - assuming the original £1 share is worth a hell of a lot more (as after all it is a "right" to all those divi's) would it be OK to:
1. Have the company buy back the shares and deduct this cost from (company) taxable profits
2. Have my spouse pay only CGT on the profit from selling back the shares - and if so if this happens pre 2007/8 would that be one of the things that gets a 10% CGT rate (shares held well over 2 years) or is it best to wait for the start of 2007/8 and the new flat 18% CGT rate?Comment
-
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTax...nts/DG_4016453
The 32.5% works out to 25% after tax credit adjustment.
Originally posted by ryebank View PostWhy have you used 25% for the £36k - surely if you are making £72k then the £36k lower rate is already used so it should be 40% if you take on the extra £36k from your spouseComment
-
Ahhh ... thanksOriginally posted by sathyaram_s View Posthttp://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTax...nts/DG_4016453
The 32.5% works out to 25% after tax credit adjustment.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment