A contractor mate of mine says you only need to keep full records for 3 years - this seems a bit low to me. Can anyone advise?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Investigations - How long should you keep your records?
Collapse
X
-
Investigations - How long should you keep your records?
"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "
Thomas Jefferson -
I've always worked on 6 years for personal and company records, but I haven't checked lately, they may have reduced the requirement.Blog? What blog...?
-
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
-
In terms of IR investigations it's 6 years. But if they discover fraud they can then go back 20 years. If you don't have those records it may be difficult to counter any allegations that are made.Originally posted by RuprectA contractor mate of mine says you only need to keep full records for 3 years - this seems a bit low to me. Can anyone advise?Comment
-
Thanks All. ASB - Moscow's link above seems to contradict what you've said; were you referring to something else?
Cheers,
Rup."Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "
Thomas JeffersonComment
-
No I was referring to the context of an IR investigation. See here:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pdfs/sabk4.htm#a2
Moscows link defines a 3 year period - but for a different purpose.Comment
-
Originally posted by RuprectA contractor mate of mine says you only need to keep full records for 3 years - this seems a bit low to me. Can anyone advise?
Until you have your first fire or flood."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Ah OK. Thanks. Will go with the 6 year period then.Originally posted by ASBNo I was referring to the context of an IR investigation. See here:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pdfs/sabk4.htm#a2
Moscows link defines a 3 year period - but for a different purpose."Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "
Thomas JeffersonComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment