I’m not sure that everyone has noticed this but there’s a thread in HMRC Enquiries that all contractors with accountants should read:
Churchill Knight & Boox clients being investigated as Managed Service Companies - Contractor UK Bulletin Board
What is the Issue?
Basically, HMRC are going after these accountants’ clients because said accountants are managing their clients too closely for them to be in business for their account.
(Chapter 9 of Part 2 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003
Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (legislation.gov.uk)
What does ‘managing them too closely’ mean?
We aren’t sure, but think that it has to do with
Why now?
Who knows? It could be that the stars (or legislation) are aligned to make this a successful line of attack by HMRC.
HMRC seem to be using this and the outside/inside IR35 fee-payer legislation in a pincer movement to force all contractors into inside IR35 contracts.
From HMRC’s pov, it’s so much cheaper and cost-effective to go after many contractors' customers (fee-payers) or suppliers (accountants) than it is to go after single contractors.
More information here:
As HMRC tries for new scalps under the MSC legislation, 150 is the magic (yet ominous) number (contractoruk.com)
https://forums.contractoruk.com/acco...contracts.html
(PS - I'll update this with feedback to make sure that it's as accurate as we can make it.)
Churchill Knight & Boox clients being investigated as Managed Service Companies - Contractor UK Bulletin Board
What is the Issue?
Basically, HMRC are going after these accountants’ clients because said accountants are managing their clients too closely for them to be in business for their account.
(Chapter 9 of Part 2 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003
Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (legislation.gov.uk)
What does ‘managing them too closely’ mean?
We aren’t sure, but think that it has to do with
- accountant using their own portal and auto-filling fields, and/or
- accountants using 2-tier payment options for when a contractor is in and out of contract
Why now?
Who knows? It could be that the stars (or legislation) are aligned to make this a successful line of attack by HMRC.
HMRC seem to be using this and the outside/inside IR35 fee-payer legislation in a pincer movement to force all contractors into inside IR35 contracts.
From HMRC’s pov, it’s so much cheaper and cost-effective to go after many contractors' customers (fee-payers) or suppliers (accountants) than it is to go after single contractors.
More information here:
As HMRC tries for new scalps under the MSC legislation, 150 is the magic (yet ominous) number (contractoruk.com)
https://forums.contractoruk.com/acco...contracts.html
(PS - I'll update this with feedback to make sure that it's as accurate as we can make it.)
Comment