Hi all
Just looking for some information about insurance.
My company’s client is a UK-based service provider - contract is governed by UK law. I’ll be working on a project for their US-based client, working on their systems remotely. I guess this is a fairly common situation.
I’m told by insurance brokers (and various threads here) that I don’t need anything other than standard insurance cover because the contract is governed by uk law. That would cover breach of contract and disputes between my ltd and the client.
But these policies still exclude any action taken in US so would not cover any action taken directly by the end client.
My question is whether there is any possibility, however unlikely, that the end-client could sue my ltd for negligence (rather than breach of contract) directly. Is this something that anyone else has considered?
I’m fairly sure I’m overthinking this but would welcome any comments.
Just looking for some information about insurance.
My company’s client is a UK-based service provider - contract is governed by UK law. I’ll be working on a project for their US-based client, working on their systems remotely. I guess this is a fairly common situation.
I’m told by insurance brokers (and various threads here) that I don’t need anything other than standard insurance cover because the contract is governed by uk law. That would cover breach of contract and disputes between my ltd and the client.
But these policies still exclude any action taken in US so would not cover any action taken directly by the end client.
My question is whether there is any possibility, however unlikely, that the end-client could sue my ltd for negligence (rather than breach of contract) directly. Is this something that anyone else has considered?
I’m fairly sure I’m overthinking this but would welcome any comments.
Comment