Originally posted by ladymuck
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
24 month expense rule
Collapse
X
-
Similar journey to you. Although instead of to / from LB it's now LV. I'm not sure on the difference in the cost, probably 50 quid more a month, time wise probably an additional 20 mins each way. Not sure if that would be an argument I could use.... -
I'd say not. Others will disagree.Originally posted by CompoundOverload View PostSimilar journey to you. Although instead of to / from LB it's now LV. I'm not sure on the difference in the cost, probably 50 quid more a month, time wise probably an additional 20 mins each way. Not sure if that would be an argument I could use....
Down to your attitude to risk.Last edited by northernladuk; 31 October 2019, 15:31.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
IMO the extra £600 a year cost and 20 minutes extra is more than enough to deem it substantially different. It's not at all comparable to the usual example of "different workplace, same location" where somebody works at two different offices in the City of London. Refer back to the bridge worker example, where simply a changing of route in order to get to the other side of the bridge is considered substantially different...if that is, then so is yours.Originally posted by CompoundOverload View PostSimilar journey to you. Although instead of to / from LB it's now LV. I'm not sure on the difference in the cost, probably 50 quid more a month, time wise probably an additional 20 mins each way. Not sure if that would be an argument I could use....Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment