Hi,
Coming up for 2 years ago I closed my company using a Members Voluntary Liquidation MVL (using MVL Online who were excellent). The other day saw an email from contractor weekly with updated guidance on MVL and just got round to reading it.
Bit of background, closed my company after 20 years of contracting as working at government department for 10 years as contractor and they were getting rid of contractors and applied for permanent role which I got. Was always concerned about the guidance and whether this was deemed to be carrying on in same way as new permanent job was what I was doing before but was open to interpretation and was too early for anyone to have been through it and investigated. Conclusion drew at time was that as had company 20 years and was going into permanent employment for foreseeable future then although carrying on was not as contractor or other disguised contract arrangement would be okay as not opening and closing companies and actively avoiding tax when taking whole situation into account.
The updated guidance that came out couple of weeks ago :
TAAR for that - Contractor Weekly
Now when I read it worries me a bit, cant see too much difference but has re-awakened worry on the interpretation on the carrying on or involved in statement. Given a while since April 2016 has anyone any more experience on the implementation of rules or if the recent update on the guidance has any effect ?
Many thanks
Ex LimitedMan
Coming up for 2 years ago I closed my company using a Members Voluntary Liquidation MVL (using MVL Online who were excellent). The other day saw an email from contractor weekly with updated guidance on MVL and just got round to reading it.
Bit of background, closed my company after 20 years of contracting as working at government department for 10 years as contractor and they were getting rid of contractors and applied for permanent role which I got. Was always concerned about the guidance and whether this was deemed to be carrying on in same way as new permanent job was what I was doing before but was open to interpretation and was too early for anyone to have been through it and investigated. Conclusion drew at time was that as had company 20 years and was going into permanent employment for foreseeable future then although carrying on was not as contractor or other disguised contract arrangement would be okay as not opening and closing companies and actively avoiding tax when taking whole situation into account.
The updated guidance that came out couple of weeks ago :
TAAR for that - Contractor Weekly
Now when I read it worries me a bit, cant see too much difference but has re-awakened worry on the interpretation on the carrying on or involved in statement. Given a while since April 2016 has anyone any more experience on the implementation of rules or if the recent update on the guidance has any effect ?
Many thanks
Ex LimitedMan
Comment