Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Managing expenses efficiently
Collapse
X
-
-
It really does. The rule looks forward.Originally posted by youngguy View PostIt really doesn't
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...anual/eim32080
The fact you are financially planning for it to last more than 24 months also removes the 'plausible deniability' excuse.prevents a workplace from being a temporary workplace where an employee attends it in the course of a period of continuous work that lasts, or is likely to last, more than 24 months
Being anonymous helps, and you can do what you want as it's difficult to prove.
But your gig is likely to last, or you expect it to last, more than 2 years as your original post suggest so the rule applies now.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Indeed...but the word there is LIKELY. There is nothing to suggest I will receive an extension offer,or if I do....I will take it. This curiosity came from a conversation with someone else.Originally posted by Lance View PostIt really does. The rule looks forward.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...anual/eim32080
The fact you are financially planning for it to last more than 24 months also removes the 'plausible deniability' excuse.
Being anonymous helps, and you can do what you want as it's difficult to prove.
But your gig is likely to last, or you expect it to last, more than 2 years as your original post suggest so the rule applies now.
BTW, In the last week I walked into a jewellers and had a look on rightmove, as well as muttering a nasty name about someone. Doesn't mean I am getting a watch, moving house and about to commit assault!
But if you say so, [emoji106]Comment
-
Useful thread this. Maybe it should be a sticky?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
If there is one guarantee it's that every single Q on here gets some useful answers, peppered inbetween a whole load of ill founded assumption, irrelevance and keyboard warrior/ego building action.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostUseful thread this. Maybe it should be a sticky?
Still keeps us all out of (too much) trouble and entertained, so it's all good! [emoji6]
Now let's all get out there and enjoy the sun!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment