Originally posted by kaiser78
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Child maintenance through dividends?
Collapse
X
-
-
Then that's what he should do.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI'm not sure OP really has any say in that, short of shutting the company down."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
So he is a director and she is a director.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThen that's what he should do.
How does he close the ltd without her agreeing and wanting/taking a cut ?Comment
-
If she’s a shareholder and her dividends entitle her to a capital distribution on winding up (which they should do to avoid settlements issues) then she is entitled to a cut.Originally posted by radish2008 View PostSo he is a director and she is a director.
How does he close the ltd without her agreeing and wanting/taking a cut ?Comment
-
You forget he's also an individual so nothing can stop him setting up a new company and contracting through that.Originally posted by radish2008 View PostSo he is a director and she is a director.
How does he close the ltd without her agreeing and wanting/taking a cut ?"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Of course you can, if it's mutually agreed. But if you are mutually agreeing, you could probably just use your existing ltd and modify things as needed.Originally posted by notasockie View PostIs it possible to wind down my existing ltd and spin up a new one with 2 classes of shares - one for the director ie me and one my wife who would solely be a shareholder.
There are many potential problems, as others have noted. There are many reasons why this could go pear-shaped. But without knowing the people involved and the exact details of your situation, none of us could really say what is good and what is bad in your particular case.
The fact that it is taxable to your ex is not necessarily a problem -- it may be cheaper to structure it with enough to compensate her for the tax she would have to pay, than it would be to pay child maintenance out of your after tax income. It partly depends on whether she has other income. Just be aware that the tax hit she'll have needs to be reflected, and that you don't want to leave her short of what she needs to take care of your children.
If things are that amicable between you that you think having her as a shareholder of your company is a good idea, then perhaps you should consider trying to mend your relationship enough that you can stay together. If you can treat each other with respect and consideration, that would be better for the children (and the finances, for that matter). If you can't treat each other well, you'd best not try to be business partners.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment