Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Director loan...help!
Collapse
X
-
-
Admin has tagged this thread.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostRemember this is the professional part of the forums - choose your language more carefully.Comment
-
Seemed fair enough to me.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostRemember this is the professional part of the forums - choose your language more carefully.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
I believe in paying your fair share in tax. Your fair share should not be based on how much you earned within a specified calendar year. It should be based on how much you cost to the government.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostSo you don’t believe in paying tax?
Income and profit do not even represent one's true wealth hence the concept of income tax is incorrect twice.
Its not my money, but its also not the government's money. They should not care how much someone earned or has in his/his company's bank account, its none of their business.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostIt’s not your money. It’s the company’s money. Think about why the rule is there. It’s an anti avoidance charge to prevent people from taking an untaxed loan and never repaying it. The charge itself is temporary and will be repaid in the period after the loan is repaid.Comment
-
An interesting viewpoint. Are you saying that if you cost the government more you should pay more tax or less than someone who costs the government less? Because that sounds very much like "tax those with the lowest incomes more than the higher ones", which generally leads to a huge increase in the national debt.Originally posted by michaelC View PostI believe in paying your fair share in tax. Your fair share should not be based on how much you earned within a specified calendar year. It should be based on how much you cost to the government.Comment
-
It would also mean children, the sick, the unemployed and old people paying tax which is likely to prove problematic too.Originally posted by TonyF View PostAn interesting viewpoint. Are you saying that if you cost the government more you should pay more tax or less than someone who costs the government less? Because that sounds very much like "tax those with the lowest incomes more than the higher ones", which generally leads to a huge increase in the national debt.Comment
-
The tax discussion presumably belongs in General.
OP never came back to give details, makes it pretty hard to help him out.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment