• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Work Place Pension Charges

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Bert007 View Post
    I spoke to the Pension Regulator last week and we do qualify for auto enrolment, so our accountant was right.

    That 5 employee rule is pre staging date. After the staging date its auto enrolment

    Quite happy with my accountants advice just a little concerned about charges hence my original post!
    from Nest's website

    "It’s completely free for employers to use, with no charges to set up NEST or for ongoing administration."
    NEST's charges I What is NEST I NEST Pensions
    See You Next Tuesday

    Comment


      #12
      I saw that about the NEST charges being free.

      My accountant advised me there is still a monthly extra fee even if you opt out. This covers the software fee, which is a monthly charge, and time for the set up and advice regarding auto enrolment.

      Quite happy to pay if they are doing work for me otherwise why should I.

      Comment


        #13
        Auto enrolment | Business Advisers | Working out your client's costs | The Pensions Regulator

        Also found this link

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Bert007 View Post
          I spoke to the Pension Regulator last week and we do qualify for auto enrolment, so our accountant was right.

          That 5 employee rule is pre staging date. After the staging date its auto enrolment

          Quite happy with my accountants advice just a little concerned about charges hence my original post!
          The situation is made complex by you regarding the officers of your company as employees. (You have to very careful of the language you use when discussing a company that is used for contracting.)

          The majority don't so are exempt from auto-enrolment and just had to send a letter in.

          Anyone Lance has pointed out you can do it yourself.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            #15
            Whilst NEST is free, that's an irrelevance. What is not free is the time value of doing

            (a) declaration of compliance
            (b) nominating a scheme
            (c) communicating with eligible employees
            (d) dealing with opt outs assuming all employees opt out, and you cannot coerce them to do so.

            A one person or one person and spouse company (typically a "PSC") with no other employees generally can opt out of the whole shenanigans, a to d above, with a simple email to TPR.

            In your case as you have non officer employees, you can't wholesale opt out of Auto Enrollment, and therefore the choices are:

            - You do it
            - your accountant / payroll bureau does it and charges
            - your accountant / payroll bureau does it and absorbes the cost

            And that is a commercial issue of course, and one for negotiation.

            For OP, if there are no regular deductions then a monthly fee seems possibly unfair, although without knowing the details it may be that the provider has decided not to charge on a transactional basis and just to inflate all charges to cover cost of AE - there is some merit in that if it's fair and equitable across their whole client base.

            My advise to OP is to ask the provider to justify the charge and work, and, if so inclined, seek to negotiate to reduce costs and do some if it in house, or have a fixed set up fee. However if the provider has simply inflated all costs across the board on a simple employee number stratified tariff, then the answer may be no.

            Comment

            Working...
            X