• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Contracting through a LTD Co whilst not being a director

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    How many behind the scenes major shareholders actually pull the strings in big business? Quite a few I'd suggest, where they want to influence the company (and moreover an industry).
    The problem (or potential problem) here is not who owns the company and who is a shareholder, it's the old thing about shadow directors. If you are directing the company's business and financial activities while someone else pretends to be a director, then HMRC will take a close interest in both your tax affairs since this is a potential for evasive activities as well as being potentially fraudulent (not in your case, perhaps, but that isn't the issue). It is covered in the Companies Act 2006 and a good summary of the risks are over here.

    If you're genuinely worried about privacy then talk to Companies House. Don't risk triggering an investigation just to set up an unnecessary pretend organisation.
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      Yeah but there is other governance and procedure in place in that model. The shareholder doesn't have access to the business bank account and so on. I see what you are saying but I don't think big business and our model compare. Just seems wrong. Maybe I'm over thinking it.
      The legalities are the same, size matters not. Does the shareholder need access to the business bank account, or simply enough influence to "encourage" the MD to declare a dividend.

      What the OP's intended role within the company is could be interesting though, especially from both an insurance and remuneration standpoint.
      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by malvolio View Post
        The problem (or potential problem) here is not who owns the company and who is a shareholder, it's the old thing about shadow directors. If you are directing the company's business and financial activities while someone else pretends to be a director, then HMRC will take a close interest in both your tax affairs since this is a potential for evasive activities as well as being potentially fraudulent (not in your case, perhaps, but that isn't the issue). It is covered in the Companies Act 2006 and a good summary of the risks are over here.

        If you're genuinely worried about privacy then talk to Companies House. Don't risk triggering an investigation just to set up an unnecessary pretend organisation.
        I don't personally care, I'm through a "normal" ltd framework. It's unfortunate that this person feels threatened; I hope they're not doing it to simply avoid ex-wife/CSA claims.
        The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
          I don't personally care, I'm through a "normal" ltd framework. It's unfortunate that this person feels threatened; I hope they're not doing it to simply avoid ex-wife/CSA claims.
          I've been lucky enough to not have any dealings with CSA, but don't you have to declare your income anyway? Not being a director wouldn't help there, but being a cad might.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
            I've been lucky enough to not have any dealings with CSA, but don't you have to declare your income anyway? Not being a director wouldn't help there, but being a cad might.
            Not so sure about that.

            Contractors' Questions: Does the CSA consider dividends? :: Contractor UK

            They can request the company accounts as part of the process. I'd guess he's either trying not to be found hence hiding his address or hiding the fact he's a director to try and avoid declaring his dividend income. Either way he's going to come unstuck eventually and when he does it's going to be a rough ride for him.

            That said we've no idea if this is the case anyway.
            'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              Not so sure about that.

              Contractors' Questions: Does the CSA consider dividends? :: Contractor UK

              They can request the company accounts as part of the process. I'd guess he's either trying not to be found hence hiding his address or hiding the fact he's a director to try and avoid declaring his dividend income. Either way he's going to come unstuck eventually and when he does it's going to be a rough ride for him.

              That said we've no idea if this is the case anyway.
              https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...worked-out.pdf

              Income includes dividends for CSA calculation (pages 45 and 46) so if this is the intention then it won't make any differnece unless someone lies about their income.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                Not so sure about that.

                Contractors' Questions: Does the CSA consider dividends? :: Contractor UK

                They can request the company accounts as part of the process. I'd guess he's either trying not to be found hence hiding his address or hiding the fact he's a director to try and avoid declaring his dividend income. Either way he's going to come unstuck eventually and when he does it's going to be a rough ride for him.

                That said we've no idea if this is the case anyway.
                As you say, we've no idea.

                Best advice if you don't want your name "in lights" is to go umbrella and take the hit on the tax.
                The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
                  https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...worked-out.pdf

                  Income includes dividends for CSA calculation (pages 45 and 46) so if this is the intention then it won't make any differnece unless someone lies about their income.
                  Ah yes, sorry I was angling at keeping retained profits to artificially lower his income which I thought he couldn't do but reading up that's in the case of divorces when the company is an asset, not in the case of CSA so it's company money not his.

                  I misread your original post incorrectly which started me off on the wrong path. Am just gonna.... like.... quietly crawl back under my rock. Nothing to see here. Move on.....
                  'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X