Originally posted by Maslins
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
SJD price increases
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
Agreed, generic marketing to potential clients is one thing but specifically targeting a particular accounting practices clients through direct mail (SJD's in this case) is an ethical step too far in my view -
That's different, then. Certainly that's not ethical.Originally posted by Maslins View PostPerhaps, but a staff member from the firm in question will most likely have taken a copy of that database of clients when they left SJD. There is no public list of which business is with what accountant.
It's easy enough to find out some, if not all, contractors with SJD. It's not very sophisticated but if you know the postcode of SJD office you can do a registered office search and then from that get the personal addresses of the directors. Time consuming and definitely unethical, but possible.Comment
-
Originally posted by Alan @ BroomeAffinity View PostThat's different, then. Certainly that's not ethical.
It's easy enough to find out some, if not all, contractors with SJD. It's not very sophisticated but if you know the postcode of SJD office you can do a registered office search and then from that get the personal addresses of the directors. Time consuming and definitely unethical, but possible.
Comment
-
Not at all. Thought about it. Looked into it. Decided it wasn't for me.Originally posted by pr1 View Post
Comment
-
Agreed, if you trawled Companies House you could send to anyone registered at SJD offices. However, how has the letter ended up at other accountants registered offices, especially as the client has been there for over 2 years ??? Had to be a database.Originally posted by Alan @ BroomeAffinity View PostThat's different, then. Certainly that's not ethical.
It's easy enough to find out some, if not all, contractors with SJD. It's not very sophisticated but if you know the postcode of SJD office you can do a registered office search and then from that get the personal addresses of the directors. Time consuming and definitely unethical, but possible.
Its disappointing as this competitor, in my eyes, was starting to build a good reputation for themselves.Comment
-
Yes, but we're discussing ethics hereOriginally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostHappens with recruiting firms all the time, they always take a copy of contacts / database.Comment
-
Are you implying the person/company use to work at SJD and that is where they've got the mailing list from? That would be very unethical indeed and could end up in fight between them and SJDOriginally posted by DanielGenieAccountancy View PostAgreed, if you trawled Companies House you could send to anyone registered at SJD offices. However, how has the letter ended up at other accountants registered offices, especially as the client has been there for over 2 years ??? Had to be a database.
Its disappointing as this competitor, in my eyes, was starting to build a good reputation for themselves.
Comment
-
As I said earlier, happens all the time, in all industries.Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View PostAre you implying the person/company use to work at SJD and that is where they've got the mailing list from? That would be very unethical indeed and could end up in fight between them and SJD
In addition, you would have to be able to prove it.
Is it ethical? No.
Is it business (for some)? Yes.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Appreciate it happens all the time in all industries but if you were the new owners of SJD and got wind of this (assuming something untoward has gone on, it may well have not) surely you'd want to mount a fight? Again, I appreciate it has to be proved but I'm guessing SJD can throw more money at this than most if they want to...Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostAs I said earlier, happens all the time, in all industries.
In addition, you would have to be able to prove it.
Is it ethical? No.
Is it business (for some)? Yes.Comment
-
I think they would have a hard job proving it, that's my point.Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View PostAppreciate it happens all the time in all industries but if you were the new owners of SJD and got wind of this (assuming something untoward has gone on, it may well have not) surely you'd want to mount a fight? Again, I appreciate it has to be proved but I'm guessing SJD can throw more money at this than most if they want to...The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Today 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Yesterday 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54

Comment