Originally posted by buddy99
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Claiming expenses incurred abroad finding client
Collapse
X
-
Ahhh. All becomes clear. One of those selective readers that is only actually here looking for one answer.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
Plus a fairly good likelihood of coming under fairly intense scrutiny again at some point in the future.Originally posted by TheCoconutDog View PostRisk is tax + interest + 100% penalty of the tax. If you proffer a false document then you're into the areas of fraud.
Sounds to me that to have any hope of claiming this, some falsification is going to be required. E.g. you didn't set up your company and then go in an entrepreneurial sales trip for contracts. You went over for some permie interviews and are now trying to rewrite history. Good luck with that.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Well I am not willing to re-write history or lie. You are allowed to claim for expenses incurred prior to setting up a company. That said I did go to the US with the aim of finding either a permanent or contractor job and I got a contractor job and set up a company. It sounds like, as my intent was not to find work solely for my (as yet) unformed company, that I would be disallowed on these grounds? i.e. I was also open to non contractor rolesSounds to me that to have any hope of claiming this, some falsification is going to be required. E.g. you didn't set up your company and then go in an entrepreneurial sales trip for contracts. You went over for some permie interviews and are now trying to rewrite history. Good luck with that.
Anyway, this seems to be a somewhat complicated case. Sounds like it is worth at least raising with accountant even if he shuts it down straight away.Last edited by buddy99; 10 June 2015, 19:47.Comment
-
Claiming expenses incurred abroad finding client
Read notice 490 carefully (and maybe 480 too). Carefully put together your case. Talk to an accountant - or better still a specialist tax advisor. IME accountants are good at telling you how much tax you owe, but some are not that hot at correctly determining whether you owe it at all according to the letter of the tax law.Last edited by TheCoconutDog; 10 June 2015, 19:58.Comment
-
Thanks, in the end it sounds like it might be more hassle than it is worth.Originally posted by TheCoconutDog View PostRead notice 490 carefully (and maybe 480 too). Carefully put together your case. Talk to an accountant - or better still a specialist tax advisor. IME accountants are good at telling you how much tax you owe, but some are not that hot at correctly determining whether you owe it at all according to the letter of the tax law.
Since people keep raising the length of time I was over there, I should clarify that the interviews were both pre-planned and pretty spread out. Because of company availability, they were more or less spread evenly throughout the first 3-4 weeks. Its not like I had 4 interviews in a one week period and I decided to go for 6 weeks anyway. It would have been financially and logistically impractical/impossible to fly back and forth. I appreciate though the point that it does not look ideal. I did not go to "stake the area out". I have been to the area numerous times. I went simply to interview for jobs.
In terms of my expenses, I actually spent most of the time in a very boring hotel in a very boring suburb using hotel points to pay for my stay. I only had 7 nights in hotels where I paid using money, and they only add up to about £350 in total. My flights were £350 and my car hire was £400 for the 4 weeks(we hired a different car after I stopped looking for work). I was very limited on funds and had to keep my expenses low. I do not have petrol or food receipts, only credit card statements(I probably couldn't claim for food anyway). Therefore, the best I could save is 20% of £1100, which is £220. Hardly seems worth the hassle this seems to be. If it was an open and shut case of "yes you can claim these no problem, they won't bat an eye", then I would... but it sounds like a lot of pain for little gain.Last edited by buddy99; 10 June 2015, 20:22.Comment
-
Hallelujah! At last it's dawning on him. You are also selectively ignoring the wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business bit and the holiday and so on and so on.Originally posted by buddy99 View PostThanks, in the end it sounds like it might be more hassle than it is worth.
Since people keep raising the length of time I was over there, I should clarify that the interviews were both pre-planned and pretty spread out. Because of company availability, they were more or less spread evenly throughout the first 3-4 weeks. Its not like I had 4 interviews in a one week period and I decided to go for 6 weeks anyway. It would have been financially and logistically impractical/impossible to fly back and forth. I appreciate though the point that it does not look ideal. I did not go to "stake the area out". I have been to the area numerous times. I went simply to interview for jobs.
In terms of my expenses, I actually spent most of the time in a very boring hotel in a very boring suburb using hotel points to pay for my stay. I only had 7 nights in hotels where I paid using money, and they only add up to about £350 in total. My flights were £350 and my car hire was £400 for the 4 weeks(we hired a different car after I stopped looking for work). I was very limited on funds and had to keep my expenses low. I do not have petrol or food receipts, only credit card statements(I probably couldn't claim for food anyway). Therefore, the best I could save is 20% of £1100, which is £220. Hardly seems worth the hassle this seems to be. If it was an open and shut case of "yes you can claim these no problem, they won't bat an eye", then I would... but it sounds like a lot of pain for little gain.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Claiming expenses incurred abroad finding client
Mmmm. I'm not so sure that the wholly, exclusively and necessarily test is shot down here. It's maybe worth the punt. As always with HMRC, it's never black and white (much as though they'd like it to be.).Originally posted by northernladuk View PostHallelujah! At last it's dawning on him. You are also selectively ignoring the wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business bit and the holiday and so on and so on.
The bit I think is most dubious is that the expenditure pre-dates the company formation. This may or may not be material. I have no idea of the answer.Comment
-
It opens the door to someone asking "if they claim this, what is there in the accounts that's dodgy?". If the OP is claiming that this job (and I choose that word deliberately) is outside IR35, I wouldn't want anything else that might be suspicious raising any flags.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostPlus a fairly good likelihood of coming under fairly intense scrutiny again at some point in the future.Comment
-
Thanks Coconut. I'll check with accountant anyway, see what he says.Originally posted by TheCoconutDog View PostMmmm. I'm not so sure that the wholly, exclusively and necessarily test is shot down here. It's maybe worth the punt. As always with HMRC, it's never black and white (much as though they'd like it to be.).
The bit I think is most dubious is that the expenditure pre-dates the company formation. This may or may not be material. I have no idea of the answer.
Out of interest, assuming I am under IR35, which I almost certainly am, and will be subject to the higher 40% tax bracket on my income, then I would effectively be saving 40% on this amount if it was allowed, is that correct? I apologise for being very naive about all this..
Also again out of interest, my company was formed this April, which means I would not need to put these expenses through until next year? If I am permanently living in the US at that stage, as I hope to be, and the company is wrapped up, would that have any effect on how aggressively HMRC challenges my expenses, especially if smallish amounts. I am assuming it makes not the slightest difference....but just wondering.Last edited by buddy99; 10 June 2015, 21:49.Comment
-
Nevermind, I do not believe I am inside IR35 having researched the subject and re-read my contract.Out of interest, assuming I am under IR35, which I almost certainly amComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment