• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Plus VAT or not plus VAT?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    Its because he's spokesman for PCG IPSE!
    NO I'M NOT and I've never said I was. I'm just a member who happens to think they are doing the right thing. Feel free to disagree but do not mis-represent my position

    As for "wrong", those were the rules when I first learned about VAT Accountancy (as an accountant) many years' ago when Tolley's was only two volumes big and were still the rules when I started contracting. And a re-issued invoice or an amendment to one or a rider to an issued one, providing both sides are in agreement about the terms of trade, are equally valid.

    So it may be incorrect in terms of current practice, but it's not wrong.
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #22
      .....

      Originally posted by malvolio View Post
      NO I'M NOT and I've never said I was. I'm just a member who happens to think they are doing the right thing. Feel free to disagree but do not mis-represent my position

      As for "wrong", those were the rules when I first learned about VAT Accountancy (as an accountant) many years' ago when Tolley's was only two volumes big and were still the rules when I started contracting. And a re-issued invoice or an amendment to one or a rider to an issued one, providing both sides are in agreement about the terms of trade, are equally valid.

      So it may be incorrect in terms of current practice, but it's not wrong.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by tractor View Post
        LOL yourself. How about

        NO I'M NOT and I've never said I was. I'm just a member who happens to think they are doing the right thing. Feel free to disagree but do not mis-represent my position

        As for "wrong", those were the rules when I first learned about VAT Accountancy (as an accountant) many years' ago when Tolley's was only two volumes big and were still the rules when I started contracting. And a re-issued invoice or an amendment to one or a rider to an issued one, providing both sides are in agreement about the terms of trade, are equally valid.

        So it may be incorrect in terms of current practice, but it's not wrong.
        Selective quotation is such fun, isn't it...
        Blog? What blog...?

        Comment


          #24
          ...

          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          LOL yourself. How about



          Selective quotation is such fun, isn't it...
          I told you before, when you are in a hole, you should stop digging. You are simply proving the correctness of Tykemerc's statement below.

          Selective quotation indeed. Right/wrong, correct/incorrect are binary.

          Comment


            #25
            85%?! I think you're in for a nasty surprise.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by tractor View Post
              I told you before, when you are in a hole, you should stop digging. You are simply proving the correctness of Tykemerc's statement below.

              Selective quotation indeed. Right/wrong, correct/incorrect are binary.
              Yes, but not synonymous...
              Blog? What blog...?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by tractor View Post
                Selective quotation indeed. Right/wrong, correct/incorrect are binary.
                "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
                  85%?! I think you're in for a nasty surprise.
                  OK, how much do you take home?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Many thanks to everyone replied. Sorry, it looks like my question was poorly worded or at least misunderstood. I think I need to split it into two:

                    1. If there is a contract advertised to pay £600 a day and nothing is said about VAT, does it normally mean that VAT is included into the rate or does it mean contractor will find £600+VAT in his account for each day? (once VAT registered)

                    2. What to do while VAT registration pending? - this one is clear.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Ltd View Post
                      Many thanks to everyone replied. Sorry, it looks like my question was poorly worded or at least misunderstood. I think I need to split it into two:

                      1. If there is a contract advertised to pay £600 a day and nothing is said about VAT, does it normally mean that VAT is included into the rate or does it mean contractor will find £600+VAT in his account for each day? (once VAT registered)

                      2. What to do while VAT registration pending? - this one is clear.

                      1. All rates are quoted as ex-vat. This is standard procedure for any B2B transaction in the UK.
                      2. I personally delayed my invoices by a few weeks and then sent them all in with VAT added.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X