+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 63 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 52 ... LastLast
Posts 11 to 20 of 625
  1. #11

    TripleIronDad

    BrilloPad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    89,295
    Thanks (Given)
    13140
    Thanks (Received)
    2744
    Likes (Given)
    13140
    Likes (Received)
    5656

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by neo222 View Post
    I am hoping AML will help me out though as it would be in their best interests now I will be running a full commentary on this forum - and the fact that they are still trading and making a lot of money I expect..
    I reckon that when Montpelier will drop the s58 lot if they stop trading.

    Just remember that not many do due diligence before going into these schemes so what you post on here might not be read by many.

    It is easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.

  2. #12

    Fingers like lightning


    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    850
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    34

    Default

    I had a sales call its AM limited last year. I was dubious about the scheme but they assured me that if I were investigated they would provide all legal defence. Lave it with them to deal with and try not to speak to HMRC directly without legal representation. And I mean legal, not your accountant.

    It may also be worth joining the PCG if you haven't already, they have legal helplines which might help you understand your position.

  3. #13

    More time posting than coding


    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    295
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default

    A colleague at work got the same letter a few weeks ago. AM are handling it and have already replied to the letter before the Xmas break. Contact them in the first instance....no reason why they won't handle your case as well.
    Last edited by sal626; 30th December 2012 at 13:02.

  4. #14

    Double Godlike!

    malvolio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
    Posts
    10,004
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    165
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoJoGabor View Post
    I had a sales call its AM limited last year. I was dubious about the scheme but they assured me that if I were investigated they would provide all legal defence. Lave it with them to deal with and try not to speak to HMRC directly without legal representation. And I mean legal, not your accountant.

    It may also be worth joining the PCG if you haven't already, they have legal helplines which might help you understand your position.
    Legal helplines and lots of solid advice on their fora, agreed, but this particular investigation won't be covered under their PEI insurances since it's already started.
    Blog? What blog...?

  5. #15

    TripleIronDad

    BrilloPad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    89,295
    Thanks (Given)
    13140
    Thanks (Received)
    2744
    Likes (Given)
    13140
    Likes (Received)
    5656

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by malvolio View Post
    Legal helplines and lots of solid advice on their fora, agreed, but this particular investigation won't be covered under their PEI insurances since it's already started.
    Would PCG cover a loan scheme anyway?

    Even if they did the OP would be better off using AM as long as possible IMO.

  6. #16

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    26
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sal626 View Post
    A colleague at work got the same letter a few weeks ago. AM are handling it and have already replied to the letter before the Xmas break. Contact them in the first instance....no reason why they won't handle your case as well.
    Thank you. I expect it would be in their interests to help. I expect a lot of AML's clients will get these at one point or another..

  7. #17

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    26
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by malvolio View Post
    Legal helplines and lots of solid advice on their fora, agreed, but this particular investigation won't be covered under their PEI insurances since it's already started.
    Yep, I am a member of PCG, but you are correct. Loan Schemes and a few other schemes are not covered unfortunately..

  8. #18

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    26
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Would PCG cover a loan scheme anyway?

    Even if they did the OP would be better off using AM as long as possible IMO.

    I'm confused. Why would I be better to carry on using AM? Surely, if HMRC ever did legislate and managed to apply retro law I'd be screwed for a much larger amount.

  9. #19

    Fingers like lightning


    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    850
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    34

    Default

    Bauer and Cotrelll are another firm that might be able to help you with representation.

    Please keep us posted of how things go.

  10. #20

    Super poster


    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,791
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    38
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by neo222 View Post
    I'm confused. Why would I be better to carry on using AM? Surely, if HMRC ever did legislate and managed to apply retro law I'd be screwed for a much larger amount.
    I think he means to use AM's legal resources for as long as possible before exploring other representation. If, as it sounds, AM are on the case already, then that's a positive sign. Give them a call on Wednesday.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 63 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 52 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.