-
-
Do we **have** to read the daily mail? Is there a version on another webite?Originally posted by eliquant View Post
No doubt whatever it is it is the fault of asylum seekers. -
Beating an assailant so much he's permanently brain damaged after you've chased him down the street is not "reasonable force"."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
WHS. Seems an open and shut case to me.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
The principle at stake here is the "rule of law"
Next.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
-
Evidently the judge & jury (if there was one?) disagree.Originally posted by Jeebo72 View Post"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
-
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
What makes you right?Originally posted by Jeebo72 View Post"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Easy enough to talk about measured response sitting in a court room but I think it is expecting too much to expect someone who has been attacked in his own home and had his family threatened to then make a cool level-headed decision about what is a reasonable degree of force. He did not invite the situation after all.
So the bloke has a brain injury. Who cares? At least other law abiding citizens might now be safe from his attentions.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
Comment