IPSE: is there an update on when you plan to provide a response to the consultation? I'm aware the deadline is approaching. Also, will you be publishing it here / on your website?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You're probably not going to like this - we certainly don't
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostIPSE: is there an update on when you plan to provide a response to the consultation? I'm aware the deadline is approaching. Also, will you be publishing it here / on your website?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostIPSE: is there an update on when you plan to provide a response to the consultation? I'm aware the deadline is approaching. Also, will you be publishing it here / on your website?Comment
-
Originally posted by IPSE View PostWe'll be publishing our response, a call to action from IPSE members via direct email and on our website, a press release and various blogs on Thursday 18th August.Comment
-
Well its a response. Why on earth it uses the term PSC in any place is something that I cannot comprehend even though I know the consultation uses it..
Let's see if it has any chance of commanding the sea....merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostWell its a response. Why on earth it uses the term PSC in any place is something that I cannot comprehend even though I know the consultation uses it..
Let's see if it has any chance of commanding the sea....
Obviously everyone will have views on areas that could have been stronger (for me it's around 5pc expenses and what it means for pensions) but it had stats from a 'real' institution and it came up with a tiered option from 'do nothing' through to 'dont rush it'.
I was pleasantly surprised .
Will it make a difference? I doubt it.Comment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostTo be fair I think it uses the term as the Gov did. It does cite the issue with the term early on.
Obviously everyone will have views on areas that could have been stronger (for me it's around 5pc expenses and what it means for pensions) but it had stats from a 'real' institution and it came up with a tiered option from 'do nothing' through to 'dont rush it'.
I was pleasantly surprised .
Will it make a difference? I doubt it.Last edited by eek; 18 August 2016, 08:27.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostTo be fair I think it uses the term as the Gov did
Language shapes thought. Parrotting HMRC's twisted newspeak automatically subordinates one to HMRC's twisted worldview.Comment
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostAnd that in itself is already a grave mistake.
Language shapes thought. Parrotting HMRC's twisted newspeak automatically subordinates one to HMRC's twisted worldview.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostAnd that in itself is already a grave mistake.
Language shapes thought. Parrotting HMRC's twisted newspeak automatically subordinates one to HMRC's twisted worldview.
The Gov have created a PSC definition and seem intent on using it. I don't agree with it, but it is often a case of picking the battles and I don't know that having a document that just blank refused anything the Gov said would have been useful.
Its been clear that Gov are convinced we are a cash cow and now I think it is about getting the 'least bad option' .
The doc cites the lack of psc definition in section 2.2 and then says it will use it given the Gov does. I personally don't think you can dismiss the entire document based on this alone.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment