• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What do you think will happen to agencies next April?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
    Agree I am on 100 notes less a day now compared to my London Rate (my choice), bonus is I have a 5 second commute as I WFH, get to see my kids and am less stress free. If I do go back to London it will cost me 90 quid a day which I will factor into my rate x2 as its not just the money but time also, in fact not being able to claim it back means I probably won't bother.
    Could potentially be the best future working model, barring the inevitable cabin fever that sets in about 4 months into pure wfh
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

    Comment


      #32
      Wishful thinking here: How about the agencies cut their margins? If you charge £2/h for low skill bod why do you charge £5-10h for high skill bod? Presumably the amount of work you have to do is the same, yet you want a % cut....

      And why on earth would the agency be entitled to a % of the ongoing contract if they are not doing any ongoing admin work, after the introduction?

      Like it or not i believe the upcoming changes will have the result HMRC/Gov desire - a lot of the contractors that are indeed a disguised employees will move to permiedom where they belong. The rest will take a hit, some might be able to negotiate a rate increase based on the supply/demand in their area of expertise or geographical location.

      In any case the Agencies will survive, like any parasites they live as long as the host lives and tehre will always be need for flexible work force be it ltd contractors, umbrella or agency temps.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by sal View Post
        Wishful thinking here: How about the agencies cut their margins? If you charge £2/h for low skill bod why do you charge £5-10h for high skill bod? Presumably the amount of work you have to do is the same, yet you want a % cut....
        The £2 P/h is approx 14%, which about the average of what I charge clients, which means on a £80 per hour contract I'd charge £11 (napkin maths here!)

        If you can't understand the difference in difficulty in finding someone to log and flog on the phones, and finding someone to build enterprise software, then you really have no grasp of how most of this works.

        We charge a set margin as it just makes business simpler and more transparent - all my clients and contractors know my margins, I learnt a long time ago why hiding this is bad, it never goes well.

        And as I have said before, if you do hate agents, do your own BD and find your own gigs. You do not have to use us in the days of Linkedin and mass social media.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by czakky View Post
          The £2 P/h is approx 14%, which about the average of what I charge clients, which means on a £80 per hour contract I'd charge £11 (napkin maths here!)

          If you can't understand the difference in difficulty in finding someone to log and flog on the phones, and finding someone to build enterprise software, then you really have no grasp of how most of this works.

          We charge a set margin as it just makes business simpler and more transparent - all my clients and contractors know my margins, I learnt a long time ago why hiding this is bad, it never goes well.

          And as I have said before, if you do hate agents, do your own BD and find your own gigs. You do not have to use us in the days of Linkedin and mass social media.
          I understand that in some cases it's more difficult to find the high skill bod, the point is once the contracts is signed your work volume is exactly the same regardless, yet you are charging 5 times more. So you believe that spending say 16h to find a candidate for 1 year on a 400pd which is about 90k is worth the 10%+ or 9k+ you charge

          Don't take it personal, I don't mind the agents that are doing their job professionally (and you might very well be one of these), unfortunately they are a minority. On the other hand I do hate the rest 90%+ of the scum that wastes my time with cold calls, offers for permie jobs, asking for 2 references and false promises that my CV was sent to the client, yet demands 10k / year for the privilege...

          Comment


            #35
            "Agencies will find a way"

            Comment


              #36
              i think agencies will need to cut their cloth according to the income, the days of selling in cheap labour that should be perm will probably end, so they will need to focus on selling in higher skilled labour. Assuming the same costs can be spread over a lot less work won't fly, so they will have to shrink to match.

              Personally I have never used an agency, and invest my time in keeping the client sweet and building my reputation - after all that is the product I sell.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by czakky View Post
                If you can't understand the difference in difficulty in finding someone to log and flog on the phones, and finding someone to build enterprise software, then you really have no grasp of how most of this works.
                Is that because "C#" breaks your CV keyword-search and you have to look through them manually?
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by DaveB View Post
                  Depending on how it all shakes out my current thinking is that I will start quoting "Rate + T&S" for new gigs. This is just what the big consultancies do now anyway so brings things in line with them. My day rate is still a fraction of what they would charge to put in someone wth less experiance.

                  If push comes to shove I am one of those in a position to absorb the costs if I have to, but that doesn't mean I won't try and avoid that if I can.
                  As the T&S consultation stands now, it won't make any difference how you bill for them - the client can pay all the expenses for you directly for all it matters. Because your travel and subsistence will need to go on your P11D and be declared as a benefit in kind - so separate them out is fine, but it's not going to help you as an individual get the money out without paying PAYE and NI on it at some stage.
                  Best Forum Advisor 2014
                  Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                  Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Changes wont make a difference to agencies. or, even clients imo so people who think rates will \ should go up are dreaming.

                    But, I think people are missing the obvious here and that's too many contractors just wont be bothered or affected.

                    They wont be bothered because they are effectively permietractors. There are plenty of contractors who've been at a client site for more than 2 years so cannot claim travel and subsistence. They wont be affected so wont campaign to retain T&S.

                    Of the remaining contractors, many, in my experience, dont travel more than 30 - 40 miles to the client site. I know permies who travel that distance every day and they dont get travel expenses.

                    In my last couple of contracts with major blue chip clients working on big projects, a straw poll suggested that only 20% of the contractors travelled 50 miles or more to work. in my current place, out of 6 contractors, 4 live within 25 miles of the client site.

                    In effect, something like 80% of contractors wouldnt 'suffer' financially if T&S was no longer claimable. Admittedly, its very much a rough poll but has been pretty constant through my contracting career.
                    I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Being ignorant as I am, I thought that the T&S rules were also going to apply to those nasty offshore visa type people?
                      Don't they come through consultancies who usually get tax relief on their T&S?
                      Would someone please explain how these people could be affected by all these potential new rules and regs?
                      Don't believe it, until you see it!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X