• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Any point in contracting after April 2016?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Intel View Post
    True. My comment was a corporation tax impact only. Depends on how you get the cash to pay the expenses, in most cases dividends which are then used to pay for the expenses out of post tax income. Depending on your dividend tax rate you end up with a value more than 20%.

    Either way my assertion was that the impact isn't going to cost you 100% more. It'll be more likely 20-25% more due to paying from post tax income. Easily covered with a modest rate rise.

    Inside IR35 assumed due to agency supply is more of a worry but again, until you can see the whites of their eyes not a lot of point worrying.
    More like >50% if you still want to take out up to the higher rate threshold. 80% after CT, around 50% left after tax is taken off that at higher rate.

    On 1500 per month, for 10 months, thats about 7-8k worse off per year.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
      More like >50% if you still want to take out up to the higher rate threshold. 80% after CT, around 50% left after tax is taken off that at higher rate.

      On 1500 per month, for 10 months, thats about 7-8k worse off per year.
      Not commenting on expenses but on higher tax on dividends etc in general - just keep the money inside of your ltd and invest... Low dividend = no problem . Economy will grow because contractors will now take the risk and invest within their company instead of pocketing cash...
      To my understanding that's what they want and that's what im going to do..

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
        More like >50% if you still want to take out up to the higher rate threshold. 80% after CT, around 50% left after tax is taken off that at higher rate.

        On 1500 per month, for 10 months, thats about 7-8k worse off per year.
        Back of a fag packet calculations. Simplified because I'm simple....

        Assuming rate of 500.
        220 days billable
        10 months expenses at 1500 a month

        Note that the below doesn't knock salary off before corporation tax, and having revised these figures 3 times I'm 1) not doing it again, 2) giving up on my dreams of becoming an accountant.

        Doesn't change the outcome though, as per pr1's note, extra cost in this scenario is 40% of the total expenses claimed.

        Current

        Total Billable - 220 * 500 = 110000
        Expenses - 15000
        Profit - 95000
        Corporation Tax = 19000
        Profit after tax = 76000
        2015 Salary and basic rate dividend allowance - 42385
        Higher Rate Dividends - 33615
        Higher Rate Dividend Tax = 33615*.25 = 8403
        Total Income = 42385 + (33615*.75) = 67596

        Expenses Out Of Taxable Income

        Total Billable = 110000
        Profit = 110000
        Corporation Tax = 22000
        Profit after tax = 88000
        Salary and divi allowance = 42385
        Higher rate dividend tax = 45615 * .25 = 11403
        total income = 79596
        Minus expenses of 15000 = 61596.

        Difference between the two is 6000 (40% of the original expenses value)

        NB: figures are subject to revision once I'm sober....... and once eek has pointed out yet another c*ck up in my data...
        Last edited by Intel; 13 August 2015, 14:32. Reason: Buggered up the original figures..... :s * 2 (kudos to eek for the pointer.... ) * 3 (pr1 kudos this time)
        Have you tried switching it off and back on again??

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by diseasex View Post
          Not commenting on expenses but on higher tax on dividends etc in general - just keep the money inside of your ltd and invest... Low dividend = no problem . Economy will grow because contractors will now take the risk and invest within their company instead of pocketing cash...
          To my understanding that's what they want and that's what im going to do..
          Invest in what I wonder?

          Drawer space? Darning wool? More "I'm never coming back to CUK" posts? Or just more utter b0ll0cks?

          I wonder just how many times this thread will be recreated by April 2016? It's already at least 3.
          Last edited by TykeMerc; 13 August 2015, 13:42. Reason: Whoops

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
            Invest in what I wonder?

            Drawer space? Darning wool? More "I'm never coming back to CUK" posts? Or just more utter b0ll0cks?

            I wonder just how many times this thread will be recreated by April 2015? It's already at least 3.
            whiskey has 40% try it. If you throw it up it will give you 100% return ;D

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by diseasex View Post
              whiskey has 40% try it. If you throw it up it will give you 100% return ;D
              I see, more utter b0ll0cks as that post makes absolutely no sense at all.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
                Invest in what I wonder?

                Drawer space? Darning wool? More "I'm never coming back to CUK" posts? Or just more utter b0ll0cks?

                I wonder just how many times this thread will be recreated by April 2015? It's already at least 3.
                Without a time machine you've had your lot pal.
                The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
                  Without a time machine you've had your lot pal.
                  Whoops, thanks

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Intel View Post
                    Back of a fag packet calculations. Simplified because I'm simple....

                    Assuming low rate of 350 (which still drops us into higher rate tax)
                    280 days billable
                    10 months expenses at 1500 a month

                    Current

                    Total Billable - 280 * 350 = 98000
                    Expenses - 15000
                    Profit - 83000
                    2015 Salary and basic rate dividend allowance - 42385
                    Higher Rate Dividends - 40615
                    Higher Rate Dividend Tax = 40615*.25 = 10153
                    Total Income = 42385 + (40615*.75) = 72846

                    Expenses Out Of Taxable Income

                    Total Billable = 98000
                    Profit = 98000
                    Salary and divi allowance = 42385
                    Higher rate dividend tax = 55615 * .25 = 13903
                    total income = 84096
                    Minus expenses of 15000 = 69096.

                    Difference between the two is 3750 (25% of the original expenses value)

                    NB: figures are subject to revision once I'm sober.......
                    You missed corporation tax off those examples...
                    merely at clientco for the entertainment

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by eek View Post
                      You missed corporation tax off those examples...
                      Bullocks. This is why I employ an accountant.....

                      One second whilst I fix it.....
                      Have you tried switching it off and back on again??

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X