• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Farewell Unobtanium / Itanic, er I mean Itanium?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Farewell Unobtanium / Itanic, er I mean Itanium?

    It is 10 years ago this summer that Compaq announced the EOL for DEC/Digital/Compaq's Alpha series in favour of Intel's Itanium. Is this Itanium's final death sentence?

    From The Register: Ellison drops iceberg in front of HP's unsinkable Itanic

    Oracle has announced that it has stopped development for all its software on Intel's high-end Itanium server processor.

    ...

    This may not be a big deal for all of the other server vendors that have abandoned the good ship Itanic - IBM, Dell, Sun Microsystems, Unisys, Fujitsu, NEC, Bull, and others - but this is a huge deal for Hewlett-Packard, which runs its flagship HP-UX Unix operating system on Itanium-based Integrity servers.
    I believe that OpenVMS (what's left of it) and Tandem's NonStop also run on Itanium. And so much for the poor Tru64 customers who were promised a port to Itanium which never happened, but were promised "We will help you to move to HP-UX".

    I wonder if HP saw this coming with their purchase of Palm.
    Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

    #2
    Yeah, good riddance - cost billions of $$$ and all that was from sales of x86 and later x64 - frankly the whole project was a disaster - can't believe it took so long to admit it failed, some real high ups must have been involved.

    Give us more cores of x64 - cheap!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      Yeah, good riddance - cost billions of $$$ and all that was from sales of x86 and later x64 - frankly the whole project was a disaster - can't believe it took so long to admit it failed, some real high ups must have been involved.

      Give us more cores of x64 - cheap!
      I understand that it was so highly touted before it was reality that other manufacturers were waiting for it rather than continue development with their own solutions. If I remember correctly the Itanium was going to be Intel's 64 bit solution and it was AMD who brought us x64.
      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Sysman View Post
        I understand that it was so highly touted before it was reality that other manufacturers were waiting for it rather than continue development with their own solutions. If I remember correctly the Itanium was going to be Intel's 64 bit solution and it was AMD who brought us x64.
        Tee hee:

        Itanium Sales Forecasts over the years
        Last edited by Sysman; 31 March 2011, 08:16.
        Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

        Comment

        Working...
        X