Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You can easily add them to the search box in FF3 by clicking on the search box down arrow, selecting Manage search engines > Get more search engines and tapping the above names into the search there.
I've so far chickened out of trying FF4, so don't know whether the method is the same or not.
Last edited by Sysman; 1 April 2011, 09:06.
Reason: links added
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.
There are other search engines out there. I recently tried these versus Google on some search or other and managed to dig out some better results: Blekko DuckDuckGo
...
Those are new ones to me, and I'll check them out. Thanks!
Anybody else formulated an informed opinion about a complex piece of software within a few hours of its release? Obviously, pointing out that it does a bit more than Netscape Navigator 3 and therefore has a greater memory footprint than a piece of software designed for the days when 128MB was a huge amount of RAM for a desktop machine is an important point to make, but I was wondering if anybody had any views on some of the more recondite aspects of this release - stuff like the bit more that it does than Netscape Navigator 3, or indeed than Internet Explorer 4
I'll be tempted to upgrade only if they have radically improved the atrocious Bookmarks functionality.
What this needs at the very least is a much larger window, where you can "bookmark" sites/pages by more than one keyword, and the ability to run a link-check on all saved links.
I'll be tempted to upgrade only if they have radically improved the atrocious Bookmarks functionality.
What this needs at the very least is a much larger window, where you can "bookmark" sites/pages by more than one keyword, and the ability to run a link-check on all saved links.
The link-check idea is a good one. Why not post it as an enhancement suggestion?
Mind you what I really want is a link-check that sees into the future and does a grab of bookmarked articles which will disappear next week.
Oi Threaded, we need an API for your time machine here!
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.
also with this noscript thing you have to allow javascript, refresh and then allow pop-ups, refresh - it's clunky and had to use firefox the other day and really missed this (one piece) of functionality
sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice - Asimov (sort of)
there is no art in a factory, not even in an art factory - Mixerman
... where you can "bookmark" sites/pages by more than one keyword, and the ability to run a link-check on all saved links.
I think the programmers' balancing act is how many people want these advanced features, compared to how many people want a fast browser.
Software often evolves into having an installation where users are offered a "Typical" installation, compared to an "Expert" installation. But... then you are inviting a host of new bugs!
Well, it's been pestering me to update for a few days now, so I thought I have a look.
Don't like the tabs being moved to the top. Is there a way to change it back to the old position so that the tabs are directly above the viewing window?
Is appears to have busted MS videos done in Silverlight. It did that the last time I tried it.
Comment