FireFox 3 on Mac needs force quit almost hourly

[bogeyman]

FF 3.0.11 on OS X 10.4.11 particularly.

FireFox 3.x is as good as gold on Windows XP, but is a steaming heap on OS X 10.4.11.

After a few hours, or even minutes of usage, it stops displaying images, doesn't follow hyperlinks and eventually grinds to a halt.

I like(d) FF, and I use the webdev and other plug-ins.

If I didn't need the plug-ins, I could at least use Safari, which I don't really like much as a day-to-day browser (V4 esp).

It seems that the Moz FF team are not interested in resolving their failures on the OS X platform.

I have removed all plug-ins and add ons. My 10.4.11 is as vanilla as it comes, but FF3 behaves like a temperamental piece of crap.

I have now resorted to using FF3 with plugins under a Fusion Windows XP VM.

FireFox sucks, for Mac Users

[tino]

What's wrong with Safari?

I think it's the dugs danglies

[bogeyman]

What's wrong with Safari?

I think it's the dugs danglies

Safari has always been a bit primitive, poor UI customisation, and V4 is decidedly flakey and slower than 3 (and please, spare me that Top Sites tulipe).

If you just surf the web, then I'm sure it's fine, but if you do any serious web-app development, it's utter pants.

FF offered the best set of tools and plugins for web dev, but the FF devs are clearly not interested in OS X these days, and will not fix the many problems that exist (have existed) since FF 2.0 on OS X.

FF3 for OS X gets worse and worse with every point upgrade.

[tino]

Safari has always been a bit primitive, poor UI customisation, and V4 is decidedly flakey and slower than 3 (and please, spare me that Top Sites tulipe).

If you just surf the web, then I'm sure it's fine, but if you do any serious web-app development, it's utter pants.

FF offered the best set of tools and plugins for web dev, but the FF devs are clearly not interested in OS X these days, and will not fix the many problems that exist (have existed) since FF 2.0 on OS X.

FF3 for OS X gets worse and worse with every point upgrade.

That must be why I like it

[bogeyman]

That must be why I like it

Yep, well we have different requirements and expectations, I suppose.

[VectraMan]

I thought everything on an Apple "just worked", and the peer review processes and dedicated individuals that make up open source projects mean it isn't possible for any open source project to have any flaw whatsoever.

I'm so confused.

[bogeyman]

I thought everything on an Apple "just worked", and the peer review processes and dedicated individuals that make up open source projects mean it isn't possible for any open source project to have any flaw whatsoever.

I'm so confused.

As you probably well know, nothing 'just works'.

And OSS projects are at least as fallible as any commercial offering.

At least when OSS code is busted, I can fix it, or I know a 'man who can'.

[Moscow Mule]

I have removed all plug-ins and add ons. My 10.4.11 is as vanilla as it comes, but FF3 behaves like a temperamental piece of crap.

Therein lies your trouble. You want that 10.5 upgrade.

Safari 4 is noticeably (order of seconds) faster than 3 on Leopard.

I rarely use FF, except for a check of the occasional client website update and I don't use any plugins but I've never had a problem with it.

[Platypus]

FF 3.0.11 on OS X 10.4.11 particularly.

try FF 3.5 (recently released)

[xchaotic]

FF 3.0.11 on OS X 10.4.11 particularly.

While I can't force you to upgrade to Leopard, I certainly see no reason why you shouldn't get FF3.5 - it's got massive improvements in JS performance among other things...