Could anyone explain the difference between these three technologies, especially involving their impact on a target machine (in the registry, etc)?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
COM,COM+, .NET
Collapse
X
-
ShutitFuelShutitFuel
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
-
DimPrawnDimPrawn
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
Com+ is Com running on Windows 2000 or XP or 2003 server.
Com+ makes use of the registry to hold configuration and is not firewall friendly in inter-machine comms.
.Net stores it's config in XML files and can communicate via httpon port 80 (e.g. SOAP).
Registering Com+ applications requires changes to the registry.
Deploying .Net applications requires simply xcopying the files and folders, unless centralised .net assemblies are used, in which case they are deployed to the Global Assembly Cache, which is a special directory on the machine.
Hope this rambling helps. -
ShutitFuelShutitFuel
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
x
Thanks DimPrawn.
Do you know if there are of any examples of extra functionality in com+ as opposed to com?
For instance, I believe COM+ allows better isolation?
Why do we need the COM+ explorer ( under admin tools). Does anyone have a practical explain of using this to achieve a typical task?
Regarding XCOPY this isn't really recommended is it? We would have no COM interop, no self-repair, rollback, etc. Is this correct?
If anyone else wants to add anyting please feel free.Comment
-
Paul ParanoiaPaul Paranoia
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
Re: x
> Com+ makes use of the registry to hold configuration and is not firewall friendly in inter-machine comms.
> .Net stores it's config in XML files and can communicate via httponport 80 (e.g. SOAP).
You can use SOAP to communicate over httpwith COM+ too.Comment
-
DimPrawnDimPrawn
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
Re: x
Yes, but COM+ Soap services requires COM+ 1.5 which means
"COM+ 1.5 is included in Microsoft® Windows® XP and in Microsoft Windows Server 2003. The new COM+ 1.5 features are not available in earlier platforms, such as Microsoft Windows 2000."
So bear that in mind.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment