• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Maximum files in a folder?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Maximum files in a folder?

    Does anyone know if there's a cap on the number of files in a folder using Windows 2000? I get an error when dumping loads of images via a batch file in a folder saying "no space left on disk" or something. No, its not because there's no space on my HDD.

    #2
    Are you running NTFS or FAT32?

    65,535 per folder on FAT32

    millions on NTFS

    Comment


      #3
      yeah and drastic performance drop after a few thousands...

      if you think of storing that many files think again!!! Even IE creates multiple directories to avoid have too many cache files in the same dir.

      Comment


        #4
        AtW, performance doesn't deteriorate too much if you disable the indexing!

        Spod.

        Comment


          #5
          Performance actually does deteriorate - a lot less on NTFS than on old FAT, just listing all files in dir takes ages - you'd think this simple operation will be fast but it aint, I had 3k+ small files in one dir at work on Win2K and it took bloody ages to list them (P4 2.4, 1Gb RAM) - I mean more than a well more than a few seconds!

          Oh maybe you think I know £"%^£^% about "£%"£%? Perhaps you have forgotten one year old chat where you lost technical argument regarding branch prediction? To your credit you admitted defeat.

          Comment


            #6
            AtW, performance doesn't deteriorate too much if you disable the indexing!
            Maybe you should learn to read...

            Also, it was nearer two years ago.

            Comment


              #7
              Maybe you cant read - I affirm that performance _does_ deteriorate significantly, ie much.

              Thats with indexing disable, something I do among first things after fresh install, WinXP and Win2003 are all based on same NTFS, AFAIK this arae was not improved, however it will be big time in WinFS - they will finally stop needing to "table scan" all files in dir to find them, ie will use internal filename indexing as well as content indexing.

              Comment


                #8
                But not as much you dense twat!

                Comment


                  #9
                  i was just thinking that you will call me that

                  lets agree on this - I was right in the first place, but I am still a twat?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    As a break from one of the normal AtW v "somebody who might actually know something" sessions may I suggest ...

                    For christ's sake don't take your machine to PC World for repairs.

                    G. Glitter

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X