First off... never leave information out of vetting.... ever... be it just a finacial check for working in a bank or criminal records for SC / DV. Firstly you are commiting fraud infront of the very people that are most likely to find out and take action. Secondly if and when they do find out you will most definately be walked off or not get the contract. The whole idea of these vetting processes is to make sure you are honest and reputable. A few financial misdemeanours (f**k knows how you spell it ok) they can swallow, lying they cannot.
What they are looking for is to see if you are in a position whereby you my be coerced or blackmailed or be tempted to use their systems to get you out of a pile of trouble. Being in debt with an agreed method of getting out and sticking to it is as good as it gets with dept. Being up to your eyeballs and not paying regularly is not good. You may be tempted to do something naughty if your debt is beyond manageable.
Personally if I had to take a bet here I would say those amounts are very small, it isn't uncommon for students to mess up financially and (I am guessing here) dealing with PPI means you may not be dealing directly with accounts and money transfers. If this is the case I don't see why they would be too upset.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: New to contracting. Credit check help.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "New to contracting. Credit check help."
Collapse
-
New to contracting. Credit check help.
Hello there. I have applied for my first contract as a PPI case handler with Deloitte as the client. I have passed the interview and assessment and Deloitte confirmed that they would be happy to take me on, this was while Hire-Right were still processing the vetting. I wrote on my application form that 4 years ago when I left university I defaulted on 2 overdraft limits, one for £2300 and one for £1000. They were sent to a debt collection agency and I am still paying back on a monthly basis.
The vetting process was completed today and my credit check came back fine. The agency advised that as I wrote down about the two above defaults on the application they will need to refer this to Deloitte for approval.
Do you think I will still get the contract? When applying for future contracts do you think I should just leave the information about the defaults out?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Leave a comment: