- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Inside IR35 - OutSide IR35
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Inside IR35 - OutSide IR35"
Collapse
-
I smell the next shake up of the IR35 landscape once HMRC have gotten bored with this one.
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThe mistake wasn't joining an umbrella. That was probably your only option at the time. It was the choice of umbella that was the problem. Are you still with the bad one or did you manage to swap to a compliant one at some point during the engagement?
If you are going to continue working there make sure you are very familiar with IR35. Being public sector it's very easy to become part and parcel. I know the risk is on your client to make the determination but that's no reason to get slack and put your own status at risk. Who knows what is coming down the line in the future.
Still can't claim expenses though as you are over the 24 month rule.
Being public sector do they not have a 2 year limit on contractors? Many don't but there are still some.
Leave a comment:
-
The mistake wasn't joining an umbrella. That was probably your only option at the time. It was the choice of umbella that was the problem. Are you still with the bad one or did you manage to swap to a compliant one at some point during the engagement?
If you are going to continue working there make sure you are very familiar with IR35. Being public sector it's very easy to become part and parcel. I know the risk is on your client to make the determination but that's no reason to get slack and put your own status at risk. Who knows what is coming down the line in the future.
Still can't claim expenses though as you are over the 24 month rule.
Being public sector do they not have a 2 year limit on contractors? Many don't but there are still some.Last edited by northernladuk; 11 February 2020, 01:51.
Leave a comment:
-
For you personally? Not very high, providing you have not sought to mislead them in any way (highly doubtful that you could), because the responsibility and liability rests with the Fee Payer (or client), not you or YourCo (were you to create one). As you may know, the IR35/ITEPA legislation will mostly likely change in April, but these changes are comparatively small for public sector contracts; for example, you should receive a Status Determination Statement from the client.
In terms of the umbrella company, as you've sadly learned to your cost, that was a tax avoidance scheme masquerading as a legitimate umbrella company:
Disguised as an umbrella company | All Umbrella Companies Are Equal
edit: Oh, by the way, I interpreted "public company" as public sector. If you are not in the public sector, then my answer is slightly different. In that case, prior to April, the risk is with you. After April, the risk is with the supply chain above you.
Leave a comment:
-
Inside IR35 - OutSide IR35
I have been working for a public company for the past 2 years. When I joined I was put inside IR35.
During this time I realised all other contractors working for same company but different managers were outside IR35. They were no differences in the jobs we were doing. As a result of this I made mistake to join umbrella company which has resulted in me having to pay the loan charge.
A new manager has now taken over my department and they ran the IR35 tool and they have put me outside of IR35. They would like to extend me for another 6 months and I will have a new contract outside IR35.
What is the risk with this ?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: