• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More "Gig Economy" news: Court backs salesman's claim for 13 years of holiday pay"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by poorautojobber View Post
    So do you think he got caught inside by Hector and thought bugger it I need the cash to pay 13 years back tax? I'd imagine 27k won't touch the sides!
    Won't work for us.

    We work through limited companies and aren't sole traders so the rules are different.

    Leave a comment:


  • poorautojobber
    replied
    So do you think he got caught inside by Hector and thought bugger it I need the cash to pay 13 years back tax? I'd imagine 27k won't touch the sides!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by washed up contractor View Post
    A common misunderstanding. He may have the status of 'worker' rather than contractor \ self employed.
    The article states:
    "After he was dismissed from the firm, a UK tribunal ruled that Mr King should have been classified as a worker. "

    So workers have employers and freelancers have clients.

    Leave a comment:


  • washed up contractor
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Throughout the article, the firm are referred to as the "employer" rather than the client. I wonder if Hector will be checking that he's paid the correct tax?
    A common misunderstanding. He may have the status of 'worker' rather than contractor \ self employed.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Throughout the article, the firm are referred to as the "employer" rather than the client. I wonder if Hector will be checking that he's paid the correct tax?
    No because he is a worker so covered by one set of rules for employment and another for tax.

    It may give Hmrc an incentive to ensure employment and tax laws relating to work match each other

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren at Fox-Bartfield
    replied
    Lawyers

    Can see this being the next PPI type cash cow for solicitors going forward, no win no fee basis!

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Throughout the article, the firm are referred to as the "employer" rather than the client. I wonder if Hector will be checking that he's paid the correct tax?

    Leave a comment:


  • More "Gig Economy" news: Court backs salesman's claim for 13 years of holiday pay

    Court backs salesman's claim for 13 years of holiday pay - BBC News

Working...
X