Originally posted by kaiser78
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Photo Scanning Question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Photo Scanning Question"
Collapse
-
For once the suggestions from the forum matched the quality of the original question
-
1. See whether your scanning software (or some other scanning software for your hardware) will let you choose the resolution.Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostI am scanning a normal size photo but the dimension of the generated jpeg is 1700x2338.
How can I make this the standard jpeg dimension size for a photo of 3648x2736 ?
2. Or use postprocessing software to scale the image up.
3. Save in TIFF or PSD until you have finished manipulating the image, rather than JPEG, if you can.
4. What is a "normal" size photo? Do you mean a 35mm slide or negative?
5. What is "standard" about 3648x2736?
Leave a comment:
-
3648x2736 makes it about 8 MP. A standard 35mm camera like a Nikon using Fuji Film will have a resolution equal to about 5 MP. A photographic print off the same negative will be about 3 MP. So why do you want the high resolution? If you need the picture to fill 3648x2736 then use Picture Editor to resize it to the desired number of pixels or size.Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostI am scanning a normal size photo but the dimension of the generated jpeg is 1700x2338.
How can I make this the standard jpeg dimension size for a photo of 3648x2736 ?
Leave a comment:
-
Oh. That's a shame. I was about to suggest just knocking up some code to convert the file - it's only a data file and the standard is documented and available online.Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostDon't worry sorted it - without all your f**kwit suggestions...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jeebo72 View PostThese guys are being a bit fastidious, just take the photo as described and scan as said. Then get a higher resolution camera, and take a photo, of the scanned photo. Repeat until desired size.
If you accidently go higher than the resolution required, use a less resolution camera, to take a photo of the scanned image, from the high resolution camera. And repeat until desired size.
Leave a comment:
-
or the easier option, learn to paint .. VERY WELL .. and then replicate said image to the size you desire in it's original glory on canvasOriginally posted by Jeebo72 View PostThese guys are being a bit fastidious, just take the photo as described and scan as said. Then get a higher resolution camera, and take a photo, of the scanned photo. Repeat until desired size.
If you accidently go higher than the resolution required, use a less resolution camera, to take a photo of the scanned image, from the high resolution camera. And repeat until desired size.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jeebo72 View PostThese guys are being a bit fastidious, just take the photo as described and scan as said. Then get a higher resolution camera, and take a photo, of the scanned photo. Repeat until desired size.
If you accidently go higher than the resolution required, use a less resolution camera, to take a photo of the scanned image, from the high resolution camera. And repeat until desired size.
Leave a comment:
-
These guys are being a bit fastidious, just take the photo as described and scan as said. Then get a higher resolution camera, and take a photo, of the scanned photo. Repeat until desired size.
If you accidently go higher than the resolution required, use a less resolution camera, to take a photo of the scanned image, from the high resolution camera. And repeat until desired size.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostI am scanning a normal size photo but the dimension of the generated jpeg is 1700x2338.
How can I make this the standard jpeg dimension size for a photo of 3648x2736 ?Yup, that's clearly for a 10 Megapixel camera.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostEdit: And since when has the standard JPEG dimension for a photo been 3648x2736 pixels? Surely this would depend on the camera.
Also, what is a "normal size photo"? 10"X8"? 5¼"X3¾"? 190mmX73mm (whatever "mm" are)?
Leave a comment:
-
Well, let me put my psychic hat on and see if I can figure out which scanning application you're using....Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostHow do I do this ?
There should be an option when you're scanning to select the number of dots per inch (dpi) you're scanning at. Try increasing this.
Edit: And since when has the standard JPEG dimension for a photo been 3648x2736 pixels? Surely this would depend on the camera.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Today 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Leave a comment: