- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Another nutty firefox problem
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Another nutty firefox problem"
Collapse
-
Invariably in these situations it's IE that get's it wrong - even when you might think IE is right, or more logical.
I always test page layouts in FF and Safari first, because (99%) they get CSS right.
Once it works in FF and Safari, I test in IE and use conditional stylesheets to work around IE's brokenness.
Oh and yes, a complete CSS reset is the best starting point to get rid of silly browser defaults.Last edited by bogeyman; 14 September 2009, 13:24.
Leave a comment:
-
Yep, it's the default margin that Firefox applies to p tags. Most people use a reset stylesheet to remove all default browser styles. Then you can start with a clean slate.
Leave a comment:
-
Also freaks on Google Chrome...
Try adding margin: 0; to the styles of the elements in question.
Leave a comment:
-
Another nutty firefox problem
Here's a little bit of test jscript with two P elements with position:absolute:-
document.getElementById("p0").style.top="30px";
document.getElementById("mark").style.top=document .getElementById("p0").style.top;
As you would expect they line up vertically. If you now change one of them to DIV there is no change in IE but in Firefox they are no longer aligned. In Firefox it seems that the Ps were not correctly placed in the first place, it is not the physical top of the box that was at 30px but the bottom of the text inside it.
Any solutions to force it into sensible behaviour apart for using something other than P? Cheers.Last edited by xoggoth; 14 September 2009, 11:38.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is permanent employment still the safer bet? Yes, but it's a lot less safe than it used to be. Today 04:34
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLA) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42
- Getting a mortgage when you're a contractor. The system wasn't built for you. Is that finally changing? May 22 06:11
- How deepfake AI contractors threaten umbrella company supply chains under JSL May 20 06:31
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? May 19 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? May 18 04:43

Leave a comment: