I bet they caught the BIGGEST NUMBER EVER of the HEAVIEST FISH EVER
but they got away.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Number Crunching
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Number Crunching"
Collapse
-
the fishing was rained off. we were halfway out of town this morning at 5.30 when a text came through saying that the river was in the fields.
off tomorrow again though
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scotspine View Posti'm afraid that even with your perspicacity alf, the incalculable shall remain, for the time being at least, the incalculable. it's a pet hobby of mine [prime number distribution/prediction] and it's almost as elusive as the salmon i'll be chasing tomorrow. had 2 [returned] on monday and hoping for greater things tomorrow.
Aye SP
In the same way that Grey Slates remain - Grey Slates - sadly the incalculable will remain - incalculable.
How did you get on with the Fishing ?Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 20 August 2009, 14:58.
Leave a comment:
-
i'm afraid that even with your perspicacity alf, the incalculable shall remain, for the time being at least, the incalculable. it's a pet hobby of mine [prime number distribution/prediction] and it's almost as elusive as the salmon i'll be chasing tomorrow. had 2 [returned] on monday and hoping for greater things tomorrow.
Leave a comment:
-
Good point ScotsPine - I tend to view the Universe from a broader EMS spectrum - Infra Red and Microwave being the rage this weather - as pretty as the visible universe(s) are ... but the trouble with Infinity is - well where does it all end ?Originally posted by scotspine View Posti suspect he meant the visible universe?
i was interested in how some of cantor's stuff impacted on the riemann hypothesis linky and how mandelbrot's work in the imaginary field could be inducted via cantor into it. i suspect a link between them all and a computer which can handle the production of large primes would help.
Fascinating thought about your Prime Number generator computer concept - or perhaps you have a prototype - could we - dare we ? - calculate the incalculable ?
Find out !Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 19 August 2009, 21:24.
Leave a comment:
-
i suspect he meant the visible universe?
i was interested in how some of cantor's stuff impacted on the riemann hypothesis linky and how mandelbrot's work in the imaginary field could be inducted via cantor into it. i suspect a link between them all and a computer which can handle the production of large primes would help.
Leave a comment:
-
Interesting - however - you specified a finite number for the number of atoms in the universe - which is fine if you subscribe to the view of the Universe as finite as the Aristotle camp does, even though we cannot be certain just how many atoms exist in the 'Finite' Universe - and to make it all more baffling - how do you classify and quantify the atomic structure of Dark Matter ?Originally posted by PerlOfWisdom View PostNo, that's a googol. A googolplex is ten to the power of a googol.
It's impossible to write the number, it has 10^100 digits which is more than the number of atoms in the universe.
But there is another school of thought which maintains that the Universe is Infinite - and that would imply an infinite number of atoms.
Then along comes Cantor who maintains there are in fact Three Levels of Infintity.
But in an Infinite Universe(s) - an Finite Universe must also exist - its all enough to give one a bit of a headache.
My take ?
Appoximately Infinite - more or less Incalculable.``
Whoops - got to dash - rice puddings getting burnt !Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 19 August 2009, 21:09.
Leave a comment:
-
You're confusing computers in general with Marvin the Paranoid Android.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostAnd therefore it follows that no computer has ever calculated anything positive.
Leave a comment:
-
Even that is a matter of interpretation. A single digit 1 would be -1 in twos compliment. So actually the largest (highest) number ever calculated by a computer is zero. But the largest in magnitude is -1.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostOne. It puts lots of them in a row to create the impression of representing bigger numbers; but that's just a matter of interpretation.
And therefore it follows that no computer has ever calculated anything positive.
Leave a comment:
-
Wot, all of 'em.Originally posted by PerlOfWisdom View PostNo, that's a googol. A googolplex is ten to the power of a googol.
It's impossible to write the number, it has 10^100 digits which is more than the number of atoms in the universe.
Leave a comment:
-
No, that's a googol. A googolplex is ten to the power of a googol.Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
The largest number with a name is a googolplex which is only 100 digits long. I think Python's inbuilt calculator can handle numbers that big. If not, there are free downloadable long number calculators that definitely can.
It's impossible to write the number, it has 10^100 digits which is more than the number of atoms in the universe.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostMy software sometimes accidentally calculates infinity.
Do I win?
Thanks for your help Boys !
I liked HABs response - cheeky ! - good to see HABs cheered up and no longer worrying himself senseless about Cosmic debris catastrophes - oh thats torn it !
VectraMan - very very warm - because I heard in a bar once the biggest number ever calculated was appoximately Infinite by an IBM SuperDuper 4341 Computer - you know what I came back with ?
What colour was the computer ?
He nearly spat his lager out at that one !
Weekend everybody !Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 14 August 2009, 12:50.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Today 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Yesterday 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17

Leave a comment: