• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: CMS advice

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "CMS advice"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    Oh the glory days of CMS!

    Hated it myself - more of a MVS TSO man.

    IBM described VM as a 'Hypervisor' rather than an Operating System - a way of virtualising and sharing system resources. The things you ran under VM were OSs like DOS/VSE, MVS and of course CMS.

    Then we got to the stage of mainframe hardware virtualisation (LPARs) and runnng MVS under VM in an LPAR - madness
    Well nowadays it seems to be more of a hypervisor again. I run numerous zLinux systems under it and have a friend who has run 30,000 zLinux images under zVM. Also coming up is the ability to run Sun Solaris under zVM (and rumours of Windows on the mainframe but not necessarily under zVM.) zVM has been performing virtualisation probably before the writers of VMWare et. al. were born.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Quite interesting this as the only CMS I know is Conversational Monitor System which is basically the front-end to VM but also has something called CMS Windows. Then there was a mention of DMS which once again runs under VM and was basically another part of CMS (DMSCMS) and was Display Management System/Conversional Monitor System, all of which predate the topic here by many years. Even VM which was 'purloined' by Sun/MS is in fact an operating system. I hate TLAs as there are now so many of them and all have a different meaning
    Oh the glory days of CMS!

    Hated it myself - more of a MVS TSO man.

    IBM described VM as a 'Hypervisor' rather than an Operating System - a way of virtualising and sharing system resources. The things you ran under VM were OSs like DOS/VSE, MVS and of course CMS.

    Then we got to the stage of mainframe hardware virtualisation (LPARs) and runnng MVS under VM in an LPAR - madness

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    To me a CMS is a Content Management System like Documentum.

    TLA's do cause loads of confusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Quite interesting this as the only CMS I know is Conversational Monitor System which is basically the front-end to VM but also has something called CMS Windows. Then there was a mention of DMS which once again runs under VM and was basically another part of CMS (DMSCMS) and was Display Management System/Conversional Monitor System, all of which predate the topic here by many years. Even VM which was 'purloined' by Sun/MS is in fact an operating system. I hate TLAs as there are now so many of them and all have a different meaning

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    FFS, buy Windows OS for a few hundred quid and get it all FREE with Sharepoint Services baked in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    There seems be a blurred line between the two. But I'm definitly only looking at the documents part. Which would be a lower level I think than a web CMS.
    OK, then I'm sure that PHPNUKE, Joomla etc.. as I understand them are not what you want. They AFAUI are website content managers first and foremost with Galleries, shopping carts and Forums as bolt ons.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    There seems be a blurred line between the two. But I'm definitly only looking at the documents part. Which would be a lower level I think than a web CMS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Is it a CMS or a DMS that's needed? I'm not sure a CMS (as I understand it) does what you want. I've used PHPNUKE and a PHPNUKE port called RavenNuke.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    I'll have a look into those.

    I like Alfresco because it has a shared drive for documents...I'm assuming that when a document is updated a version of the old is kept. I has tasks, and search via web browser. Can't recall if a user can drop a file into the browser or not.

    Don't know if all the capabilities are in the OpenSource version. its not clear from the website.

    Leave a comment:


  • blacjac
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    could give these lot a try
    http://www.eclipselegal.co.uk/

    not going to be free/cheap though
    I once went for a job interview there in my permie days, based in Bradford.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    That's at least reasonable. Alfresco it is.
    SugarCRM is out of the question?

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    I am looking into a CMS for my wife's legal practice.
    could give these lot a try
    http://www.eclipselegal.co.uk/

    not going to be free/cheap though

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    What does Alfresco not do that you want?

    Joomla/Drupels are more along the lines of a community site or a shopping site depending on what you bolt in. I would not see either of them as anything akin to sharepoint....

    Leave a comment:


  • portseven
    replied
    What do you want it to do?

    Good Sharepoint alternatives are

    http://o3spaces.org/Page/sp3/nctrue/index.html

    http://www.knowledgetree.com/

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    That's at least reasonable. Alfresco it is.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X