• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Filesharing between Vista and XP"

Collapse

  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by Kyajae
    The problem with XP/vista firewall is that it runs in 'stateful' mode - i.e. it logs what sites you go to and if that site sends a request back it's classed as safe. What XP/Vista does not do is check activity from applications on your PC connecting out to the intrernet and vice versa do determine if it's non-malicious activity.

    My advice is always get a good firewall. norton is cr@p but McAffee and Kapersky do some excelent products.
    Norton bought McAffee a while back and the latest version is a pile of cack IMHO. Kaspersky all the way for me!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dotnetter
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On
    Thanks for the replies folks - I got it sorted in the end. The main source of the frustration was that something as simple as connecting 2 machines via a workgroup had to be such a complete and utter headache.

    A 5 minute job like that shouldn't need over an hour of Googling and jumping through hoops trying this and that. Why is it that everytime MS bring out a new OS they have to go all doolally with bells and whistles to the extent that the basic stuff doesn't work..

    Networking XP and Vista should be seemless IMO.
    It is seemless when you know what your doing

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyajae
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco
    Windows (XP/Vista) comes with a perfectly good firewall for the majority of users so why waste the money?
    The problem with XP/vista firewall is that it runs in 'stateful' mode - i.e. it logs what sites you go to and if that site sends a request back it's classed as safe. What XP/Vista does not do is check activity from applications on your PC connecting out to the intrernet and vice versa do determine if it's non-malicious activity.

    My advice is always get a good firewall. norton is cr@p but McAffee and Kapersky do some excelent products.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Thankyou Xog,

    What get's me most about Norton is it's tendancy to 'warn' you that you're 'unprotected' every 30 seconds.

    When you do finally click on the effing thing just to make it STFU it takes you to a registration page for a 90 day trial...

    Is it any wonder those numpties at PC world push this tat so aggressively?

    I bet they don't even get any commission either.

    Feckin eedjuts

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I had a lot of problems with Norton. A fairly recent magazine test I read on a number of anti-virus programs reckoned it isn't even that good. As does this one:

    http://www.consumersearch.com/www/so...irus-software/

    However, users complain that Norton AntiVirus can slow your computer to a crawl, and that Norton conflicts with other software. Although reviewers say the 2007 version is improved, we still read many complaints about installation problems and crashes. No credible source ranks Norton AntiVirus as one of the top programs this year.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 9 July 2007, 18:37.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco
    Norton is a waste of space. Windows (XP/Vista) comes with a perfectly good firewall for the majority of users so why waste the money? Also Norton anti virus is completely useless, use a decent program like Kaspersky Anti Virus (Who better to find virus' than the people who wrote most of them??? )
    Yeah it was already installed and I'd faffed around trying to allow local network filesharing and after about an hour of tearing my hair out I decided to just remove the fecker which I intended to do anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On
    It was the removal of Norton Internet Security that enabled the XP machine to see the Vista share. Even with that removed and both firewalls turned off I still couldn't browse or connect to the XP machine from Vista though.

    They could both ping each other fine...

    I decided not to spend any more time on it after I'd copied the stuff across.
    Norton is a waste of space. Windows (XP/Vista) comes with a perfectly good firewall for the majority of users so why waste the money? Also Norton anti virus is completely useless, use a decent program like Kaspersky Anti Virus (Who better to find virus' than the people who wrote most of them??? )

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    It was the removal of Norton Internet Security that enabled the XP machine to see the Vista share. Even with that removed and both firewalls turned off I still couldn't browse or connect to the XP machine from Vista though.

    They could both ping each other fine...

    I decided not to spend any more time on it after I'd copied the stuff across.

    Leave a comment:


  • Let-Me-In
    replied
    [QUOTE

    Networking XP and Vista should be seemless IMO.[/QUOTE]

    I agree, but then again, so should restoring from data in Vista from a backup created in XP...but you can't without installing NTBackup...FFS

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Thanks for the replies folks - I got it sorted in the end. The main source of the frustration was that something as simple as connecting 2 machines via a workgroup had to be such a complete and utter headache.

    A 5 minute job like that shouldn't need over an hour of Googling and jumping through hoops trying this and that. Why is it that everytime MS bring out a new OS they have to go all doolally with bells and whistles to the extent that the basic stuff doesn't work..

    Networking XP and Vista should be seemless IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyajae
    replied
    Originally posted by Clippy
    This could have saved you some time.

    Now that is one cool bit of kit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On
    Feck me I thought this should be a doddle.

    Got my mum's new Vista (home) laptop and want to copy across all the gubbins from the XP desktop.

    Both are connected vie ethernet through a 4 port linksys ADSL router and ping each other fine.

    Well after going through the merry dance of figuring out where all the options I want are in Vista I've got the workgroup names the same on both machines, turned off the windows firewalls, uninstalled fecking Norton gobshyte internet pile of steaming turd and guess what.

    They still won't show up in my network places and I can't even connect via a \\192.168.1.x typed straight into the run command...

    ..but they still ping each other fine.

    So it's a sunny day and I'm trawling through forums etc like this one here:

    http://www.techsupportforum.com/netw...-vista-xp.html

    FFS why can't 2 versions of an OS just fecking do what they're meant to do - is that really that much to ask?

    *EDIT*

    OK can see the Vista from the XP and that'll do me!

    The removal of Norton was the last thing I tried, think I better download AVG
    This could have saved you some time.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Sympathise. It certainly is possible as I have managed to copy files over network without probs after doing same as you. However, not surprised you can't get it to work as Vista is biggest pile of tulipe since the history of the universe, slow, canes the disc constantly, unstable and every day something else does not work. Generally I do a search and find loads of other people with the same problem but no solutions. Used to do system restore on XP but that doesn't work in Vista either.

    The only thing I do find is that if an install of some program screws something up the offending settings are specific to the user. Worth trying a different one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyajae
    replied
    From reading the post, it looks like you want to transfer your My Documents, Favorites, Desktop settings etc from one computer to another right?

    XP has a File and Programs Transfer Wizard found in Start/Programs/Accessories/System Tools folder. I assume Vista must have the same facility and so you should be able to transfer one to another - would this facility work?

    (If I've read the post wrong, sorry)

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    started a topic Filesharing between Vista and XP

    Filesharing between Vista and XP

    Feck me I thought this should be a doddle.

    Got my mum's new Vista (home) laptop and want to copy across all the gubbins from the XP desktop.

    Both are connected vie ethernet through a 4 port linksys ADSL router and ping each other fine.

    Well after going through the merry dance of figuring out where all the options I want are in Vista I've got the workgroup names the same on both machines, turned off the windows firewalls, uninstalled fecking Norton gobshyte internet pile of steaming turd and guess what.

    They still won't show up in my network places and I can't even connect via a \\192.168.1.x typed straight into the run command...

    ..but they still ping each other fine.

    So it's a sunny day and I'm trawling through forums etc like this one here:

    http://www.techsupportforum.com/netw...-vista-xp.html

    FFS why can't 2 versions of an OS just fecking do what they're meant to do - is that really that much to ask?

    *EDIT*

    OK can see the Vista from the XP and that'll do me!

    The removal of Norton was the last thing I tried, think I better download AVG
    Last edited by Jog On; 7 July 2007, 16:47.

Working...
X