I think my client uses something similar to the Github branching methodology, which is fairly simple (release branch(es), dev branch, feature branches).
The simpler dev/main/release setup can also work just fine depending on how big and active the project is. You want people able to commit their work so it doesn't get lost, without the annoyance of half-done work breaking the build, so for me larger tasks suit a feature-branch well.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Any TFS experts
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Any TFS experts"
Collapse
-
Cheers fella, looks good, just what I need to refresh the memoryOriginally posted by woohoo View PostRegarding branching/merging strategy this may help give you an idea of the options. I've used some of their stuff when setting up a strategy for merging/branching.
Version Control Guide (ex-Branching & Merging) - Downloads
A common approach is to have a dev, main and release(s) branches.
Work in dev, then merge to main. Dev is deployed to your dev area, main is deployed to your test area.
People can continue to develop in the dev branch whilst main is left alone and is ready for proper testing.
When you are happy you can then deploy to production from main and create a release branch. Hotfixes are made in your release branch and merged down to main/dev. Some clients have staging areas others use the test area as staging.
A good tool for merging is Beyond Compare. I recommend this tool!
A good guide for integrating it with Visual Studio..
I've recommended Pluralsight before but I've not used any of their TFS vids. Check em out.
Leave a comment:
-
Regarding branching/merging strategy this may help give you an idea of the options. I've used some of their stuff when setting up a strategy for merging/branching.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostNeed a quick refresher on TFS, specifically around Branching and Merging code, anyone know any good online references?
Version Control Guide (ex-Branching & Merging) - Downloads
A common approach is to have a dev, main and release(s) branches.
Work in dev, then merge to main. Dev is deployed to your dev area, main is deployed to your test area.
People can continue to develop in the dev branch whilst main is left alone and is ready for proper testing.
When you are happy you can then deploy to production from main and create a release branch. Hotfixes are made in your release branch and merged down to main/dev. Some clients have staging areas others use the test area as staging.
A good tool for merging is Beyond Compare. I recommend this tool!
A good guide for integrating it with Visual Studio..
I've recommended Pluralsight before but I've not used any of their TFS vids. Check em out.
Leave a comment:
-
Any TFS experts
Potential client has TFS, can't change it, need someone to get to grips with their source code repository before moving onto change, release and implementation (where my expertise is).
Administered TFS a few years back but was a single stream of work so need to know the fundamentals of branching and merging
Leave a comment:
-
TFS is in some ways very nice, but I do dislike its branching and merging implementation - that every branch has to be stored separately in your working copy for instance.
That said, I find it less of a PITA to get to grips with than Git/Hg. Did you have any specific questions?
Leave a comment:
-

So easy with Git with it being a DVCS rather than centralised, if you have the opportunity to switch, do it.
Leave a comment:
-
Any TFS experts
Need a quick refresher on TFS, specifically around Branching and Merging code, anyone know any good online references?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Leave a comment: