Originally posted by Phoenix
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Stellent Contract 9-18 months
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Stellent Contract 9-18 months"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MordacWell spotted
Monty Python Mode On/
He's got a wife you know....
Monty Python Mode Off/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PRC1964I find it hard to believe that this thread has reached 3 pages with no sniggers over someone being called Jezz Maycock.
Monty Python Mode On/
He's got a wife you know....
Monty Python Mode Off/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PRC1964I find it hard to believe that this thread has reached 3 pages with no sniggers over someone being called Jezz Maycock.
Standards are either slipping or I'm spending too much time over in "Test Please Delete".
Leave a comment:
-
I find it hard to believe that this thread has reached 3 pages with no sniggers over someone being called Jezz Maycock.
Standards are either slipping or I'm spending too much time over in "Test Please Delete".
Leave a comment:
-
CF Lacky:- "Boss!, Boss! I have a role her ethat no-one has applied for what shall I do?"
CF Management Type:- "Why don't you do a Google for "Contractor" and see where they all "hang out"?........Mutters to himself...."Dumb feck"!
CF Lacky:-Good Idea Boss!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChurchillI very much doubt it. Junior roles aren't my gig.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FellmanPerhaps, but my successes out-weigh my defeats.
Could you be one of the candidates that they put up against me?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChurchillPerhaps you're a fuqwit and they don't like dealing with you, has this ever crossed your mind?
I've had numerous contracts through futures and wouldn't hesitate to work through them again. In fact they've supplied one of my new recruits and have proven themselves on both sides of the equation.
Dodgy, we're recruiting staffers, I'll send you the job spec when I get it.
Could you be one of the candidates that they put up against me?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FellmanWell 2, but the same lame excuses apply.
I've had numerous contracts through futures and wouldn't hesitate to work through them again. In fact they've supplied one of my new recruits and have proven themselves on both sides of the equation.
Dodgy, we're recruiting staffers, I'll send you the job spec when I get it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChurchillHow many "Perm" jobs have you had then?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FellmanI would like to add to the negative impression of CF.
When I have had to use rec firms, CF have always told me that I am unsuitable, despite me then getting the position via another rec firm and then being told that I was the best candidate amongst a load of lackys put forward by CF! This has held true for both perm and contract
Leave a comment:
-
I would like to add to the negative impression of CF.
When I have had to use rec firms, CF have always told me that I am unsuitable, despite me then getting the position via another rec firm and then being told that I was the best candidate amongst a load of lackys put forward by CF! This has held true for both perm and contract
Leave a comment:
-
Very brave of you to come on here, given the low opinion most real contractors have of your organisation (by which I mean the whole S3 stable). I have had the unpleasant experience of contracting through two S3 companies, and hell would have to freeze over before I would even consider doing it for a third time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Computer Futuresopting in of the IR35 regulations or Opting out of them. So that would generally constitute a no.
Hence why at the bottom it said it must be someone else. I can simplify if needs be.
I'm asking anyone if they are interested in a role. If they are, they are and if not then they're not.
cheers
listen carfully
You can NOT OPT In / OUT of IR35
have you tried reading the guides on this website, they are usefull, sadly you have to be able read
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: