• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Barrett 50 Cal fired into a swimming pool"

Collapse

  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    The .50 cal has a Raufoss round available which contains armor-piercing (tungsten core), explosive, and an incendiary component

    It would be an interesting hole if one of those hit you and detonated
    Mate you're talking to Mr "Boom Head-shot!!" here, I've seen the damage a .50 cal can do from 400 yards at night on a moving ship... I have to play with the sound down low so I don't wake the baby though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    But thinking about it seriously, the .50 cal is probably designed to disintegrate on impact, hence the big feck off hole it leaves.
    The .50 cal has a Raufoss round available which contains armor-piercing (tungsten core), explosive, and an incendiary component

    It would be an interesting hole if one of those hit you and detonated

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    Er. That's against the Geneva Convention, old chap.

    Strongly disapproved of.
    So it's a design flaw then... itchy chin.

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    But considering a 12.7mm shell won't penetrate 1 foot of water without breaking up it stands to reason that 30mm of rapid fire fecking hell won't go through a puddle no mater how noisy it is.

    But thinking about it seriously, the .50 cal is probably designed to disintegrate on impact, hence the big feck off hole it leaves.
    Er. That's against the Geneva Convention, old chap.

    Strongly disapproved of.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    But considering a 12.7mm shell won't penetrate 1 foot of water without breaking up it stands to reason that 30mm of rapid fire fecking hell won't go through a puddle no mater how noisy it is.

    But thinking about it seriously, the .50 cal is probably designed to disintegrate on impact, hence the big feck off hole it leaves.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    So, to cut long story short - if you see someone aiming at you from 50 cal high powered rifle then quickly jump into water to save yerself?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    That gun's a bit bigger than a .223 minigun though.
    Yeah, it's more of a BigF**kingGun.
    Last edited by Churchill; 6 May 2010, 07:51.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Drewster View Post
    .... allegedly
    You going short again?

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    I'd like to shag a Warthog - my gun would stop the pig.
    .... allegedly

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    However, since they seem to disintegrate within about a foot, the supersonic thing is a bit academic really.

    That barrett seems to make quite a bang.

    Though the mini-gun is fun.

    Must cost a bit in ammo.
    I'd like to fly a Warthog - its gun can stop the plane.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Though they're not supersonic in water, now I think about it.
    They won't be. The speed that sound travels through water is 1482 m/s (5335 km/h; 3315 mph)

    Dependent on temperature etc...

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    50 Caliber Sniper - Video


    So, all in all, it's shotgun slugs* & handguns* that have greater range in water.


    *Subsonic.
    *smaller cross section too.

    Blame it on the fact that water can't be compressed.

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    started a topic Barrett 50 Cal fired into a swimming pool

    Barrett 50 Cal fired into a swimming pool

    50 Caliber Sniper - Video


    So, all in all, it's shotgun slugs* & handguns* that have greater range in water.


    *Subsonic.

    In the prog they started with a 10 foot deep acrylic tank.

    The 9mm glock slug hit the bottom.

    The 12 gauge shotgun slug obliterated the tank.

    None of the supersonic bullets did much in the swimming pool.

    Then again, there's:

    YouTube - Obliterating a Fish In A Barrel: Mythbusters

    However, since they seem to disintegrate within about a foot, the supersonic thing is a bit academic really.

    That barrett seems to make quite a bang.

    Though the mini-gun is fun.

    Must cost a bit in ammo.
    Last edited by zeitghost; 13 June 2017, 14:56.
Working...
X