My headhunter ... - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Churchill replied

25 March 2010, 11:19
Originally posted by Jeebo72 View Post

I'm only one strike away from a ban, so I couldn't possibly call him a lying f**ker. So I won't. But can I get banned for thinking it?

I don't think they can ban you for thinking that Sasguru is a lying f....
Leave a comment:
Jeebo72 replied

25 March 2010, 11:17
Originally posted by Churchill View Post

Oi Admin, will I get banned for calling Sasguru a lying f**ker?

I'm only one strike away from a ban, so I couldn't possibly call him a lying f**ker. So I won't. But can I get banned for thinking it?
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

25 March 2010, 11:17
Originally posted by cailin maith View Post

It's taken this long luv? You have the patience of a saint!

Jude?
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

25 March 2010, 11:17
Originally posted by Churchill View Post

I asked you about the menu yesterday. You didn't create this thread as a response - that is why I'm calling you a liar.

Actually your post was in the back of mind when i did.
Believe that or not as you see fit

FFS I know the headhunter word is like a red rag to a bull when it comes to CUk, but FFS does it need this level of forensic detail and the creation of innumerable more threads
Leave a comment:
cailin maith replied

25 March 2010, 11:16
Originally posted by cojak View Post

I'm getting irritated now...

It's taken this long luv? You have the patience of a saint!
Leave a comment:
cojak replied

25 March 2010, 11:16
I'm getting irritated now...
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

25 March 2010, 11:13
Originally posted by sasguru View Post

I'll fooking dig it up if I have to

I asked you about the menu yesterday. You didn't create this thread as a response - that is why I'm calling you a liar.
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

25 March 2010, 11:11
Originally posted by Gonzo View Post

It is good to see traditions being upheld and you let the man choose the wine.

:

Keep the day job.

HTH
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

25 March 2010, 11:10
Originally posted by Churchill View Post

Oi Admin, will I get banned for calling Sasguru a lying f**ker?

I'll fooking dig it up if I have to
Leave a comment:
Gonzo replied

25 March 2010, 11:09
Originally posted by Drewster View Post

I am confused now!

You have to remember that three different people post using the sasguru login, I think there has been a changeover this week.
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

25 March 2010, 11:09
Originally posted by Drewster View Post

I am confused now!
Where does the bit with the white on white(which was included in the original post) fit in ??

and whos/what reaction were you expecting?? Churchy specifically - on your somewhat vague lunch?

SAS you really are losing it mate..... you either posted a thread about your lunch to "prove" it to Churchy/everyone
or
you posted it to get a reaction to the "Headhunter" bit.....

what exactly was so important that you needed to edit the original thread anyway?? Was it the menu? or just typos (I know it wasn't the white on white because you said so)

Wow this is really exercising you isn't it. Which part of "demented monkey on speed" are you not resembling?
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

25 March 2010, 11:08
Originally posted by sasguru View Post

Actually the reason I posted the thread is Churchy asked me to "regale him with the menu" yesterday. Unfortunately I'm not really a foodie. But lunch was very nice.

Oi Admin, will I get banned for calling Sasguru a lying f**ker?
Leave a comment:
Gonzo replied

25 March 2010, 11:06
Originally posted by sasguru View Post

and a very nice wine which the pimp chose

It is good to see traditions being upheld and you let the man choose the wine.

Well done!
Leave a comment:
shaunbhoy replied

25 March 2010, 11:06
Why invent this whole Headhunting fantasy though sas? Your outlook on most things is so pitifully off the mark normally to engender sufficient mirth, that such exercises become totally superfluous.
Leave a comment:
Drewster replied

25 March 2010, 11:06
Originally posted by sasguru View Post

Actually the reason I posted the thread is Churchy asked me to "regale him with the menu" yesterday. Unfortunately I'm not really a foodie. But lunch was very nice.

Originally posted by sasguru View Post

Anyway I was right. I got the reaction I was expecting

I am confused now!
Where does the bit with the white on white(which was included in the original post) fit in ??

and whos/what reaction were you expecting?? Churchy specifically - on your somewhat vague lunch?

SAS you really are losing it mate..... you either posted a thread about your lunch to "prove" it to Churchy/everyone
or
you posted it to get a reaction to the "Headhunter" bit.....

what exactly was so important that you needed to edit the original thread anyway?? Was it the menu? or just typos (I know it wasn't the white on white because you said so)
Leave a comment: