Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
No. it does nothing for me. And I don't off-road either. Why are you so frightened? Is it fear that your manhood might get excited in the presence of homosexuals? You poor thing.
You sound like a petulant teenager fungus. Let me destroy your argument in a few words. I am not "spouting balls", but reasoned and thought out arguments. The evidence of the danger of gay marriage is splashed over the papers, the prurient pleasure these people get in their story smacks of exhibitionism. I am not prejudiced against gay sex just its endorsement by the state in the form of "marriage". That is not a blind prejudice, just a belief that it just political correctness and panders to the egos of those who seek pleasure from perversion. Let them have their pleasure - I fail to see the benefit of a state sponsored legal contract between two gay people. If they want to do something privately that's fine.
Well Sausage Jockey, is this an example of your reasoned and thought out arguments:
"No, the human arse produces a lot of sh*t, rather like most of the nancy boys on here. Anyway my donkey friend Eeaw and I are getting married in the Spring."
Anyway, congratulations on the forthcoming happy event. Send me your address, and I'll send you some grass as a wedding present.
Or is this an example of a reasoned and thought out arguments
"A bid for equality or maybe state justification for their abnormal behaviour; the ceremony serves no purpose because marriage exists to provide a stable platform for starting a family."
You simply put forward a few of your opinons, and don't even attempt to provide even the thinnest veneer of reasoned argument. Not even a "It is so, because my holy book says so, doh".
Marriage is but one element in an efficient tax management strategy. Surely you should know that?
Good old Christians. You can rely on them to spout balls. No evidence. Just blind prejudice. Fungus.
You sound like a petulant teenager fungus. Let me destroy your argument in a few words. I am not "spouting balls", but reasoned and thought out arguments. The evidence of the danger of gay marriage is splashed over the papers, the prurient pleasure these people get in their story smacks of exhibitionism. I am not prejudiced against gay sex just its endorsement by the state in the form of "marriage". That is not a blind prejudice, just a belief that it just political correctness and panders to the egos of those who seek pleasure from perversion. Let them have their pleasure - I fail to see the benefit of a state sponsored legal contract between two gay people. If they want to do something privately that's fine.
Last edited by Jabberwocky; 21 December 2005, 21:24.
I have given you reasoned and supported argument. If you prefer to suck up to the bottom lovers that that is fine. Expect society to become more fractured, more unbalanced with greater juvenile delinquancy. For thousands of years our society has been based on the family, but now you want to enshrine in law the means to undermine those values. Same for christian values, these are the things that have provided our moral framework, our ideals, our aspirations.
You seem happy replace that with the means to just stick your willy up some poor guy's bum.
Good old Christians. You can rely on them to spout balls. No evidence. Just blind prejudice. Let's go back to the Middle Ages, where harmless old women are burnt, Muslims are murdered on mass so that we can control the Holy Land, women are oppressed and are not allowed to own property, the Pope and mates are a bunch of corrupt fornicating thieves, and religion is used as a means to control the populace. Or maybe we can advance a few centuries, and colonise Africa and other nations to bring them the civilising influence of Jesus Christ.
I remember an interview on R4 with an old guy who fought in WW2. He was in a church in France to say prayers asking God to let them win. He asked the priest what the flowers in the church were for. He said that when the village was in German control, the Germans had held a service asking God to help them win. Needless to say the absurdity of that event caused him to lose his faith. I can understand having a faith, but the sort of blind intolerant bigoted Christianity from some Christians is nothing more than the embodiment of their own wishes, and prejudices. Same for Islam and Judaism.
Can't say I have any desire to stick my todger up anyone's tulipter, male or female. Sounds repulsive and decidedly unhygienic. (Though wasn't it Woody Allan who said that sex is a disgusting business, if done properly.)
"For thousands of years our society has been based on the family, but now you want to enshrine in law the means to undermine those values"
I believe the Spartans and the Romans where impartial to a bit of male a male hocus pocus.
It appears that Alexander the Great, when he was not conquering nations, was conquering his favoured male companions
The Turks gave the jolly roger to Lawrence of Arabia, who became quite a convert.
How long has it been since we have heard of a celibate Catholic priest who has decided that extra-mural activities with choirboys is an acceptable pastime.
Homosexuality is as entrenched in our society as hetrosexuality. I think that more damage has been caused in society through supression of sexual urges than practising homosexuality.
That is a strange thing to say, that homosexuality is as entrenched in our society as heterosexuality. On no measure, social opinion or biological science can I think of any evidence to support that.
"For thousands of years our society has been based on the family, but now you want to enshrine in law the means to undermine those values"
I believe the Spartans and the Romans where impartial to a bit of male a male hocus pocus.
It appears that Alexander the Great, when he was not conquering nations, was conquering his favoured male companions
The Turks gave the jolly roger to Lawrence of Arabia, who became quite a convert.
How long has it been since we have heard of a celibate Catholic priest who has decided that extra-mural activities with choirboys is an acceptable pastime.
Homosexuality is as entrenched in our society as hetrosexuality. I think that more damage has been caused in society through supression of sexual urges than practising homosexuality.
I have given you reasoned and supported argument. If you prefer to suck up to the bottom lovers that that is fine. Expect society to become more fractured, more unbalanced with greater juvenile delinquancy. For thousands of years our society has been based on the family, but now you want to enshrine in law the means to undermine those values. Same for christian values, these are the things that have provided our moral framework, our ideals, our aspirations.
You seem happy replace that with the means to just stick your willy up some poor guy's bum.
Sounds like Jabberwock needs a good c0ck up his bum...
In any case, I thought it was funny that they were protesting at the Lesbians who recently had a Civil Partnership with boards that read "Sodomy is Sin"
..Well I'd like to know how she shoves her fanny up her arse!
Leave a comment: