• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ladies standards going down"

Collapse

  • thunderlizard
    replied
    top one

    http://community.channel4.com/eve/fo...5/m/9140054016

    tl

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    That probably explains this:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lifes...49E23R20081015

    The study found little geographic variation in the cleanliness of women's hands, with 27 percent overall found dirty.

    Leave a comment:


  • badger7579
    replied
    inside out and upside down

    Leave a comment:


  • voodooflux
    replied
    Originally posted by Chantho View Post
    Going commando more often?
    Or perhaps just wearing the same pair for longer?

    Leave a comment:


  • zara_backdog
    replied
    Originally posted by Chantho View Post
    Going commando more often?
    Less knickers = More Shoes

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Chantho View Post
    Going commando more often?
    That sounds unhygenic. I think I will check the ladies round the office just to be sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chantho
    replied
    Originally posted by badger7579 View Post
    Spending on such items was lower in 2007 than in 2006, with expenditure on women's underwear seeing one of the largest falls, statistics show.

    Spending on clothing fell during the year to an average of £22 a week - the lowest figure since 2001/02.

    In this category, the amount spent on women's underwear dropped by 20p to £1.10 a week.

    Standards Standards Standards....
    Going commando more often?

    Leave a comment:


  • voodooflux
    replied
    Originally posted by zara_backdog View Post
    No - normally more expensive
    WSS. I believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • lightng
    replied
    Originally posted by badger7579 View Post
    So you want to sell dog underwear?? I dont think they have ever been bothered by being naked. How will they sniff each others
    That was my other business idea (patent pending)

    Leave a comment:


  • badger7579
    replied
    Originally posted by lightng View Post
    You can get that from poundland?

    Thanks, thats given me a business idea.

    Marketing + Product = £££

    where Marketing = scantilly clad model pictures and usedknickers.com web-site.

    and Product = Poundland knickers and my dogs ar$e.
    So you want to sell dog underwear?? I dont think they have ever been bothered by being naked. How will they sniff each others

    Leave a comment:


  • lightng
    replied
    You can get that from poundland?

    Thanks, thats given me a business idea.

    Marketing + Product = £££

    where Marketing = scantilly clad model pictures and usedknickers.com web-site.

    and Product = Poundland knickers and my dogs ar$e.

    Leave a comment:


  • badger7579
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    If they cost less - are they skimpier?
    Or from Poundland....

    Leave a comment:


  • zara_backdog
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    If they cost less - are they skimpier?
    No - normally more expensive

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    If they cost less - are they skimpier?

    Leave a comment:


  • badger7579
    started a topic Ladies standards going down

    Ladies standards going down

    Spending on such items was lower in 2007 than in 2006, with expenditure on women's underwear seeing one of the largest falls, statistics show.

    Spending on clothing fell during the year to an average of £22 a week - the lowest figure since 2001/02.

    In this category, the amount spent on women's underwear dropped by 20p to £1.10 a week.

    Standards Standards Standards....

Working...
X