- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: SDS process
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "SDS process"
Collapse
-
I would not have any concerns. You have your SDS, issued timely. The agency is correct. Remember, the liability is with the agency/fee payer now, not with you (post April 5).
-
SDS process
My current contract ends post-April and has been assessed as outside by QDOS and a separate legal firm.
I was expecting an SDS prior to April but the client is now saying that they see no need to issue one, as they confirmed I'm outside last year (before the delay in implementation) and, as nothing has changed, that's still valid.
They said they've sent an SDS to the agency, and the agency are saying they can't forward that to me as HMRC guidance is the the client has to send it to both the worker and the agency.
From what I've read, this all seems OK... however I'm still a little uneasy about it and not quite sure why? The rules don't seem to include details on the timing of the SDS delivery and "prior to April 2021" decisions appear to be acceptable, so on that basis I got my SDS a year early and all is well.
Would any of you guys have any concerns in this case? I don't want to annoy the client unnecessarily to produce a new SDS but I will do so if the consensus is that it'd be worthwhile.
TIATags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30

Leave a comment: